These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2739042)

  • 1. Court backs states on abortion.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1989 Jul; 262(4):451-2. PubMed ID: 2739042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion law today.
    Field MA
    J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
    Schmutz SD
    Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion: trouble ahead.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion.
    Greenhouse L; Dionne EJ
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
    Neff CL
    Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Crain CA
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A woman's right, barely viable.
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():28. PubMed ID: 11646727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion is affirmed, but in a lower voice.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():E1. PubMed ID: 11647366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium.
    Chopko ME
    Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
    Law SA
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.