These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27390699)

  • 1. The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence.
    Mobinizadeh M; Raeissi P; Nasiripour AA; Olyaeemanesh A; Tabibi SJ
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2016; 30():329. PubMed ID: 27390699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model for priority setting of health technology assessment: the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approach.
    Mobinizadeh M; Raeissi P; Nasiripour AA; Olyaeemanesh A; Tabibi SJ
    Daru; 2016 Apr; 24():10. PubMed ID: 27068692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to choose health technologies to be assessed by HTA? A review of criteria for priority setting.
    Specchia ML; Favale M; Di Nardo F; Rotundo G; Favaretti C; Ricciardi W; de Waure C;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2015; 39(4 Suppl 1):39-44. PubMed ID: 26499414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods and criteria for the assessment of orphan drugs: a scoping review.
    Mohammadshahi M; Olyaeemanesh A; Ehsani-Chimeh E; Mobinizadeh M; Fakoorfard Z; Akbari Sari A; Aghighi M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Jun; 38(1):e59. PubMed ID: 35730573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Priority setting of health interventions. Review of criteria, approaches and role of assessment agencies].
    Varela-Lema L; Atienza-Merino G; López-García M
    Gac Sanit; 2017; 31(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 28057389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Healthcare priority-setting criteria and social values in Iran: an investigation of local evidence.
    Goudarzi Z; Bijlmakers L; Nouhi M; Jahangiri R; Heydari M; Simangolwa W; Hakimzadeh SM; Jara KT
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2023 Jun; 39(1):e37. PubMed ID: 37334802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scoping literature review on the basic health benefit package and its determinant criteria.
    Hayati R; Bastani P; Kabir MJ; Kavosi Z; Sobhani G
    Global Health; 2018 Mar; 14(1):26. PubMed ID: 29499708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating healthcare priority setting at the meso level: A thematic review of empirical literature.
    Waithaka D; Tsofa B; Barasa E
    Wellcome Open Res; 2018; 3():2. PubMed ID: 29511741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trauma Registry Data as a Policy-Making Tool: A Systematic Review on the Research Dimensions.
    Mobinizadeh M; Berenjian F; Mohamadi E; Habibi F; Olyaeemanesh A; Zendedel K; Sharif-Alhoseini M
    Bull Emerg Trauma; 2022 Apr; 10(2):49-58. PubMed ID: 35434165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Priority setting: the importance of incorporating opportunity costs.
    Norheim OF
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2012 Nov; 1(1):45. PubMed ID: 23181422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Challenges of Prioritization.
    Mills A
    Health Syst Reform; 2016 Jan; 2(1):20. PubMed ID: 31514657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reimbursement process in three national healthcare systems: variation in time to reimbursement of pembrolizumab for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
    Sharman Moser S; Tanser F; Siegelmann-Danieli N; Apter L; Chodick G; Solomon J
    J Pharm Policy Pract; 2023 Feb; 16(1):22. PubMed ID: 36797806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equity, justice, and social values in priority setting: a qualitative study of resource allocation criteria for global donor organizations working in low-income countries.
    Kapiriri L; Razavi SD
    Int J Equity Health; 2022 Feb; 21(1):17. PubMed ID: 35135553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Topic selection for health technology assessment: An approach combining multiple attribute decision making and decision rules.
    Mobinizadeh M; Mohamadi E; Arman H; Nasiripour A; Olyaeemanesh A; Mohamadi S
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2021; 35():40. PubMed ID: 34211942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which Criteria are Considered and How are They Evaluated in Health Technology Assessments? A Review of Methodological Guidelines Used in Western and Asian Countries.
    Wang Y; Qiu T; Zhou J; Francois C; Toumi M
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2021 May; 19(3):281-304. PubMed ID: 33426626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.