These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27391140)

  • 21. Teaching Strategies for Personality Assessment at the Undergraduate Level.
    Roche MJ; Jacobson NC; Roche CA
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 26959971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Teaching the Rorschach and learning psychodiagnostic testing: a commentary on Hilsenroth and Handler (1995).
    Silverstein ML
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Apr; 66(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 8869576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using a general model of personality to understand sex differences in the personality disorders.
    Lynam DR; Widiger TA
    J Pers Disord; 2007 Dec; 21(6):583-602. PubMed ID: 18072861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dimensions of personality pathology: an alternative to the five-factor model.
    Shedler J; Westen D
    Am J Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 161(10):1743-54. PubMed ID: 15465966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implementing Dynamic Assessments in Psychotherapy.
    Hopwood CJ; Thomas KM; Luo X; Bernard N; Lin Y; Levendosky AA
    Assessment; 2016 Aug; 23(4):507-517. PubMed ID: 27184161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of maladaptive variants of Five-Factor Model traits.
    Lynam DR
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1593-614. PubMed ID: 22321444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Personality traits and the classification of mental disorders: toward a more complete integration in DSM-5 and an empirical model of psychopathology.
    Krueger RF; Eaton NR
    Personal Disord; 2010 Apr; 1(2):97-118. PubMed ID: 22448621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do personality traits predict outcome of psychodynamically oriented psychosomatic inpatient treatment beyond initial symptoms?
    Steinert C; Klein S; Leweke F; Leichsenring F
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2015 Mar; 54(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 25145630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits.
    Anderson JL; Sellbom M; Bagby RM; Quilty LC; Veltri CO; Markon KE; Krueger RF
    Assessment; 2013 Jun; 20(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 23297369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Refining personality disorder diagnosis: integrating science and practice.
    Shedler J; Westen D
    Am J Psychiatry; 2004 Aug; 161(8):1350-65. PubMed ID: 15285958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A clinician-friendly version of the interpersonal circumplex: structural analysis of social behavior (SASB).
    Benjamin LS
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Apr; 66(2):248-66. PubMed ID: 8869570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Personality Psychopathology-Five (PSY-5): recent constructive replication and assessment literature review.
    Harkness AR; Finn JA; McNulty JL; Shields SM
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Jun; 24(2):432-43. PubMed ID: 21988184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Self-report methodology is insufficient for improving the assessment and classification of Axis II personality disorders.
    Huprich SK; Bornstein RF; Schmitt TA
    J Pers Disord; 2011 Oct; 25(5):557-70. PubMed ID: 22023295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methodology of the evaluation of the personality.
    Huber W
    Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien); 1988; 44():48-53. PubMed ID: 3223367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings.
    McCrae RR
    J Pers Assess; 1991 Dec; 57(3):399-14. PubMed ID: 1757868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The longitudinal study of personality disorders: history, design considerations, and initial findings.
    Lenzenweger MF
    J Pers Disord; 2006 Dec; 20(6):645-70. PubMed ID: 17192142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment is not enough: the SPA should participate in constructing a comprehensive clinical science of personality. Society of Personality Assessment.
    Millon T
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 12067191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: a comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches.
    Chen FF; Hayes A; Carver CS; Laurenceau JP; Zhang Z
    J Pers; 2012 Feb; 80(1):219-51. PubMed ID: 22092195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Introduction to the JPA special issue: Can the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual put the complex person back at the center-stage of personality assessment?
    Huprich SK; Meyer GJ
    J Pers Assess; 2011 Mar; 93(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 21347960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Five-Factor Model personality disorder prototypes: a review of their development, validity, and comparison to alternative approaches.
    Miller JD
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1565-91. PubMed ID: 22321333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.