564 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27391306)
1. New Primers for Discovering Fungal Diversity Using Nuclear Large Ribosomal DNA.
Asemaninejad A; Weerasuriya N; Gloor GB; Lindo Z; Thorn RG
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159043. PubMed ID: 27391306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison and validation of some ITS primer pairs useful for fungal metabarcoding studies.
Op De Beeck M; Lievens B; Busschaert P; Declerck S; Vangronsveld J; Colpaert JV
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e97629. PubMed ID: 24933453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Amplification of soil fungal community DNA using the ITS86F and ITS4 primers.
Vancov T; Keen B
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2009 Jul; 296(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 19459948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utilizing ITS1 and ITS2 to study environmental fungal diversity using pyrosequencing.
Monard C; Gantner S; Stenlid J
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2013 Apr; 84(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 23176677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diversity measures in environmental sequences are highly dependent on alignment quality--data from ITS and new LSU primers targeting basidiomycetes.
Krüger D; Kapturska D; Fischer C; Daniel R; Wubet T
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32139. PubMed ID: 22363808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understudied, underrepresented, and unknown: Methodological biases that limit detection of early diverging fungi from environmental samples.
Reynolds NK; Jusino MA; Stajich JE; Smith ME
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Apr; 22(3):1065-1085. PubMed ID: 34695878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metataxonomic comparison between internal transcribed spacer and 26S ribosomal large subunit (LSU) rDNA gene.
Mota-Gutierrez J; Ferrocino I; Rantsiou K; Cocolin L
Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 290():132-140. PubMed ID: 30340111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new fungal large subunit ribosomal RNA primer for high-throughput sequencing surveys.
Mueller RC; Gallegos-Graves LV; Kuske CR
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 92(2):. PubMed ID: 26656064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ITS-1 versus ITS-2 pyrosequencing: a comparison of fungal populations in truffle grounds.
Mello A; Napoli C; Murat C; Morin E; Marceddu G; Bonfante P
Mycologia; 2011; 103(6):1184-93. PubMed ID: 21700633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accurate Estimation of Fungal Diversity and Abundance through Improved Lineage-Specific Primers Optimized for Illumina Amplicon Sequencing.
Taylor DL; Walters WA; Lennon NJ; Bochicchio J; Krohn A; Caporaso JG; Pennanen T
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Dec; 82(24):7217-7226. PubMed ID: 27736792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Barcoding the kingdom Plantae: new PCR primers for ITS regions of plants with improved universality and specificity.
Cheng T; Xu C; Lei L; Li C; Zhang Y; Zhou S
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 26084789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High fungal diversity and abundance recovered in the deep-sea sediments of the Pacific Ocean.
Xu W; Pang KL; Luo ZH
Microb Ecol; 2014 Nov; 68(4):688-98. PubMed ID: 25004994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-read DNA metabarcoding of ribosomal RNA in the analysis of fungi from aquatic environments.
Heeger F; Bourne EC; Baschien C; Yurkov A; Bunk B; Spröer C; Overmann J; Mazzoni CJ; Monaghan MT
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1500-1514. PubMed ID: 30106226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes--application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts.
Gardes M; Bruns TD
Mol Ecol; 1993 Apr; 2(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8180733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring the accuracy of amplicon-based internal transcribed spacer markers for a fungal community.
Li S; Deng Y; Wang Z; Zhang Z; Kong X; Zhou W; Yi Y; Qu Y
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jan; 20(1):170-184. PubMed ID: 31599091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of sequencing the D2 region of the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (MicroSEQ®) versus the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions using two public databases for identification of common and uncommon clinically relevant fungal species.
Arbefeville S; Harris A; Ferrieri P
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Sep; 140():40-46. PubMed ID: 28647582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soil fungal communities underneath willow canopies on a primary successional glacier forefront: rDNA sequence results can be affected by primer selection and chimeric data.
Jumpponen A
Microb Ecol; 2007 Feb; 53(2):233-46. PubMed ID: 17106807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region--evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities.
Ihrmark K; Bödeker IT; Cruz-Martinez K; Friberg H; Kubartova A; Schenck J; Strid Y; Stenlid J; Brandström-Durling M; Clemmensen KE; Lindahl BD
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2012 Dec; 82(3):666-77. PubMed ID: 22738186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterizing the ribosomal tandem repeat and its utility as a DNA barcode in lichen-forming fungi.
Bradshaw M; Grewe F; Thomas A; Harrison CH; Lindgren H; Muggia L; St Clair LL; Lumbsch HT; Leavitt SD
BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 31906844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential bias of fungal 18S rDNA and internal transcribed spacer polymerase chain reaction primers for estimating fungal biodiversity in soil.
Anderson IC; Campbell CD; Prosser JI
Environ Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 5(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 12542711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
