These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27391911)

  • 1. Does the use of a chest compression system in children improve the effectiveness of chest compressions? A randomised crossover simulation pilot study.
    Szarpak Ł; Truszewski Z; Smereka J; Czyżewski Ł
    Kardiol Pol; 2016; 74(12):1499-1504. PubMed ID: 27391911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study.
    Putzer G; Fiala A; Braun P; Neururer S; Biechl K; Keilig B; Ploner W; Fop E; Paal P
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 50(4):594-600.e1. PubMed ID: 26607696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.
    Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Cho SJ
    Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23402967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual chest compressions and the use of TrueCPR and PocketCPR feedback devices.
    Kurowski A; Szarpak Ł; Bogdański Ł; Zaśko P; Czyżewski Ł
    Kardiol Pol; 2015; 73(10):924-30. PubMed ID: 25985725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality of a newly developed infant chest compression method applied by paramedics: a randomised crossover manikin trial.
    Smereka J; Kasiński M; Smereka A; Ładny JR; Szarpak Ł
    Kardiol Pol; 2017; 75(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 28150278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compressing with dominant hand improves quality of manual chest compressions for rescuers who performed suboptimal CPR in manikins.
    Wang J; Tang C; Zhang L; Gong Y; Yin C; Li Y
    Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Jul; 33(7):931-6. PubMed ID: 25937378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of chest compression feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in lateral tilted and semirecumbent positions: a randomised controlled simulation study.
    Song Y; Oh J; Chee Y; Cho Y; Lee S; Lim TH
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1235-41. PubMed ID: 26349025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulation intervention with manikin-based objective metrics improves CPR instructor chest compression performance skills without improvement in chest compression assessment skills.
    Al-Rasheed RS; Devine J; Dunbar-Viveiros JA; Jones MS; Dannecker M; Machan JT; Jay GD; Kobayashi L
    Simul Healthc; 2013 Aug; 8(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 23842118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motion detection technology as a tool for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality training: a randomised crossover mannequin pilot study.
    Semeraro F; Frisoli A; Loconsole C; Bannò F; Tammaro G; Imbriaco G; Marchetti L; Cerchiari EL
    Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 23238423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized trial of the chest compressions effectiveness comparing 3 feedback CPR devices and standard basic life support by nurses.
    Truszewski Z; Szarpak L; Kurowski A; Evrin T; Zasko P; Bogdanski L; Czyzewski L
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 34(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 26612703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The study of the effectiveness of chest compressions using the CPR-plus.
    Elding C; Baskett P; Hughes A
    Resuscitation; 1998 Mar; 36(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 9627067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CPR using the lifeline ARM mechanical chest compression device: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial.
    Szarpak L; Truszewski Z; Czyzewski L; Frass M; Robak O
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 35(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 27756513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
    Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect on quality of chest compressions and exhaustion of a compression--ventilation ratio of 30:2 versus 15:2 during cardiopulmonary resuscitation--a randomised trial.
    Deschilder K; De Vos R; Stockman W
    Resuscitation; 2007 Jul; 74(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 17363130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new defibrillator mode to reduce chest compression interruptions for health care professionals and lay rescuers: a pilot study in manikins.
    Barash DM; Raymond RP; Tan Q; Silver AE
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 21091330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The most effective rescuer's position for cardiopulmonary resuscitation provided to patients on beds: a randomized, controlled, crossover mannequin study.
    Hong CK; Park SO; Jeong HH; Kim JH; Lee NK; Lee KY; Lee Y; Lee JH; Hwang SY
    J Emerg Med; 2014 May; 46(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 24262059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poor chest compression quality with mechanical compressions in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Blomberg H; Gedeborg R; Berglund L; Karlsten R; Johansson J
    Resuscitation; 2011 Oct; 82(10):1332-7. PubMed ID: 21724317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can real-time feedback improve the simulated infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance of basic life support and lay rescuers?
    Kandasamy J; Theobald PS; Maconochie IK; Jones MD
    Arch Dis Child; 2019 Aug; 104(8):793-801. PubMed ID: 31164375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.