These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27392677)
21. A study to compare the efficacy of polyether ether ketone rod device with titanium devices in posterior spinal fusion in a canine model. Wang N; Xie H; Xi C; Zhang H; Yan J J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Mar; 12(1):40. PubMed ID: 28279204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Polyetheretherketone Rods in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: Mid-term Results in a Patient Series Involving Radiological and Clinical Assessment. Ogrenci A; Koban O; Yaman O; Yilmaz M; Dalbayrak S Turk Neurosurg; 2019; 29(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 30649813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study. Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical testing of a PEEK-based dynamic instrumentation device in a lumbar spine model. Herren C; Beckmann A; Meyer S; Pishnamaz M; Mundt M; Sobottke R; Prescher A; Stoffel M; Markert B; Kobbe P; Pape HC; Eysel P; Siewe J Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 May; 44():67-74. PubMed ID: 28342975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical effects of posterior pedicle screw-based instrumentation using titanium versus carbon fiber reinforced PEEK in an osteoporotic spine human cadaver model. Oikonomidis S; Greven J; Bredow J; Eh M; Prescher A; Fischer H; Thüring J; Eysel P; Hildebrand F; Kobbe P; Scheyerer MJ; Herren C Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105153. PubMed ID: 32829232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications. Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature. Seaman S; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M; Torner JC; Hitchon PW J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():23-29. PubMed ID: 28736113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages. Tan JH; Cheong CK; Hey HWD Eur Spine J; 2021 May; 30(5):1285-1295. PubMed ID: 33555365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and polyetheretherketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels. Turner JL; Paller DJ; Murrell CB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(21):E1076-82. PubMed ID: 20838271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient perception of outcomes following failed spinal instrumentation with polyetheretherketone rods and titanium rods. Sarbello JF; Lipman AJ; Hong J; Lawrence J; Bessey JT; Ponnappan RK; Vaccaro AR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(17):E843-8. PubMed ID: 20628327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Non-fusion procedure using PEEK rod systems for lumbar degenerative diseases: clinical experience with a 2-year follow-up. Huang W; Chang Z; Song R; Zhou K; Yu X BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Feb; 17():53. PubMed ID: 26833360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of nonlinearity in the materials used for the semi-rigid pedicle screw systems on biomechanical behaviors of the lumbar spine after surgery. Kim H; Lim DH; Oh HJ; Lee KY; Lee SJ Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 6(5):055005. PubMed ID: 21849724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysis. Jahng TA; Kim YE; Moon KY Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23266148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Titanium-coated PEEK Versus Uncoated PEEK Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial. Lv ZT; Xu Y; Cao B; Dai J; Zhang SY; Huang JM; Liang S; Jiang FX Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Jun; 36(5):198-209. PubMed ID: 35994033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. PEEK Versus Ti Interbody Fusion Devices: Resultant Fusion, Bone Apposition, Initial and 26-Week Biomechanics. Pelletier MH; Cordaro N; Punjabi VM; Waites M; Lau A; Walsh WR Clin Spine Surg; 2016 May; 29(4):E208-14. PubMed ID: 22801456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis. Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Li Y; Liu W World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e581-e591. PubMed ID: 29288855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone oblique cages with and without a titanium coating: a randomised clinical pilot study. Rickert M; Fleege C; Tarhan T; Schreiner S; Makowski MR; Rauschmann M; Arabmotlagh M Bone Joint J; 2017 Oct; 99-B(10):1366-1372. PubMed ID: 28963159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]