These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27392722)

  • 21. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Binaural auditory outcomes in patients with postlingual profound unilateral hearing loss: 3 years after cochlear implantation.
    Mertens G; Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20 Suppl 1():67-72. PubMed ID: 25997790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationship between acceptable noise level and the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Nabelek AK; Tampas JW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 18230861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience.
    Badran K; Bunstone D; Arya AK; Suryanarayanan R; Mackinnon N
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 16868513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The assessment of hearing impairment in patients over 60 years of age using hearing aids].
    Skrzypek A; Sekula A; Deryło MB; Kuśmierczyk J; Talar M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2014; 68(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 24484946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Acoustic hearing aid with an integrated noise generator in hearing-impaired subjects with tinnitus].
    Frachet B; Vormès E; Moyse D; Vasseur J
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2004 Nov; 121(5):266-71. PubMed ID: 15711479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Objective and Subjective Improvement of Hearing in Noise After Surgical Correction of Unilateral Congenital Aural Atresia in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Study Using the Hearing in Noise Test, the Sound-Spatial-Quality Questionnaire, and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory.
    Byun H; Moon IJ; Woo SY; Jin SH; Park H; Chung WH; Hong SH; Cho YS
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):e183-9. PubMed ID: 25695924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proposed norms for the Glasgow hearing-aid benefit profile (Ghabp) questionnaire.
    Whitmer WM; Howell P; Akeroyd MA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 May; 53(5):345-51. PubMed ID: 24484267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Responses of elderly hearing aid users on the hearing aid performance inventory.
    Schum DJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):308-14. PubMed ID: 1421466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.
    Palmer CV; Bentler R; Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 16959733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55-74-year-old first-time hearing aid users.
    Davis A
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 2():2S39-52. PubMed ID: 12918628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in hearing in 80-year-old people: a 10-year follow-up study.
    Hietanen A; Era P; Sorri M; Heikkinen E
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Mar; 43(3):126-35. PubMed ID: 15198376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].
    de Almeida K; Taguchi CK
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Rehabilitation possibilities in presbycusis].
    Kapteyn TS
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 1982 Oct; 13(5):179-85. PubMed ID: 7147320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing aid satisfaction and use in the advanced digital era.
    Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Hildesheimer M; Henkin Y
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):2029-36. PubMed ID: 22752928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory rehabilitation of older people from the general population--the Leiden 85-plus study.
    Gussekloo J; de Bont LE; von Faber M; Eekhof JA; de Laat JA; Hulshof JH; van Dongen E; Westendorp RG
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jul; 53(492):536-40. PubMed ID: 14694666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Lost Decade for Change.
    Chan ZY; McPherson B
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():827463. PubMed ID: 26557701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.