These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27393292)

  • 1. [The Freiburg monosyllable word test in postoperative cochlear implant diagnostics].
    Hey M; Brademann G; Ambrosch P
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):601-7. PubMed ID: 27393292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].
    Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 27299893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Test-retest reliability of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Winkler A; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):564-71. PubMed ID: 27286728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Phonemic balance of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Exter M; Winkler A; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):557-63. PubMed ID: 27299891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the perceptual equivalence of test lists in the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].
    Baljić I; Winkler A; Schmidt T; Holube I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):572-83. PubMed ID: 27418349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].
    Hoth S
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):540-8. PubMed ID: 27259640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Use of Freiburg monosyllabic test words in the contemporary German language : Currentness of the test words].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):549-56. PubMed ID: 27286726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Examination of a training effect in the Freiburg monosyllabic test].
    Schmidt T; Baljić I
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):584-8. PubMed ID: 27435273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].
    Memmeler T; Schönweiler R; Wollenberg B; Löhler J
    HNO; 2019 Feb; 67(2):118-125. PubMed ID: 30519714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of consonant-vowel monosyllable perception and word recognition after cochlear implantation in elderly Japanese patients.
    Omichi R; Maeda Y; Sugaya A; Kataoka Y; Kariya S; Fukushima K; Nishizaki K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(11):1108-12. PubMed ID: 26113252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].
    Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2009 Mar; 57(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 18696020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Freiburg monosyllabic test put to the test].
    Baljić I; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):538-9. PubMed ID: 27455987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Extended indications for cochlear implantation. The Freiburg results in patients with residual hearing].
    Klenzner T; Stecker M; Marangos N; Laszig R
    HNO; 1999 Feb; 47(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 10197275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of TIMIT sentence list equivalency with adult cochlear implant recipients.
    King SE; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Strube M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):313-31. PubMed ID: 22533975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].
    Müller-Deile J; Kortmann T; Hoppe U; Hessel H; Morsnowski A
    HNO; 2009 Jun; 57(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 18685820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in background noise].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Pilnik M; Saager-Post K; Dazert S; Biedron S; Oeken J; Mürbe D; Löbert J; Laszig R; Wesarg T; Langer C; Plontke S; Rahne T; Machate U; Noppeney R; Schultz K; Plinkert P; Hoth S; Praetorius M; Schlattmann P; Meister EF; Pau HW; Ehrt K; Hagen R; Shehata-Dieler W; Cebulla M; Walther LE; Ernst A
    HNO; 2013 Jul; 61(7):586-91. PubMed ID: 23076435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.