These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Prediction of methylguanine methyltransferase promoter methylation in glioblastoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging. Ahn SS; Shin NY; Chang JH; Kim SH; Kim EH; Kim DW; Lee SK J Neurosurg; 2014 Aug; 121(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 24949678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiating between Glioblastoma and Primary CNS Lymphoma Using Combined Whole-tumor Histogram Analysis of the Normalized Cerebral Blood Volume and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient. Bao S; Watanabe Y; Takahashi H; Tanaka H; Arisawa A; Matsuo C; Wu R; Fujimoto Y; Tomiyama N Magn Reson Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 18(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 29848919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of peritumoral minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from solitary metastatic lesions. Lee EJ; terBrugge K; Mikulis D; Choi DS; Bae JM; Lee SK; Moon SY AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 21178049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volume of high-risk intratumoral subregions at multi-parametric MR imaging predicts overall survival and complements molecular analysis of glioblastoma. Cui Y; Ren S; Tha KK; Wu J; Shirato H; Li R Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3583-3592. PubMed ID: 28168370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which combination of MR imaging modalities is best for predicting recurrent glioblastoma? Study of diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility. Kim HS; Goh MJ; Kim N; Choi CG; Kim SJ; Kim JH Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):831-43. PubMed ID: 24885857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient values measured by diffusion MRI and MGMT promoter methylation semiquantitatively analyzed with MS-MLPA in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Sunwoo L; Choi SH; Park CK; Kim JW; Yi KS; Lee WJ; Yoon TJ; Song SW; Kim JE; Kim JY; Kim TM; Lee SH; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH; Chang KH J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 37(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 23023975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation of solitary brain metastasis from glioblastoma multiforme: a predictive multiparametric approach using combined MR diffusion and perfusion. Bauer AH; Erly W; Moser FG; Maya M; Nael K Neuroradiology; 2015 Jul; 57(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 25845813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of Infarct Lesion Volumes by Processing Magnetic Resonance Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Qian Q; Huang HT; Xu L; Jin P; Lin M J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2016 Dec; 25(12):2821-2827. PubMed ID: 27618198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: differentiation using the initial area under the curve derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR and the apparent diffusion coefficient. Choi YS; Lee HJ; Ahn SS; Chang JH; Kang SG; Kim EH; Kim SH; Lee SK Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1344-1351. PubMed ID: 27436023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma treated with radiation therapy and concomitant temozolomide: comparison study of standard and high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging. Chu HH; Choi SH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Yeom JA; Shin H; Jung SC; Lee AL; Yoon TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 23771912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiparametric MR Imaging of Diffusion and Perfusion in Contrast-enhancing and Nonenhancing Components in Patients with Glioblastoma. Boonzaier NR; Larkin TJ; Matys T; van der Hoorn A; Yan JL; Price SJ Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):180-190. PubMed ID: 28240563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does adding FDG-PET to MRI improve the differentiation between primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma? Observer performance study. Makino K; Hirai T; Nakamura H; Murakami R; Kitajima M; Shigematsu Y; Nakashima R; Shiraishi S; Uetani H; Iwashita K; Akter M; Yamashita Y; Kuratsu J Ann Nucl Med; 2011 Jul; 25(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 21404136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging. Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiogenomics Profiling for Glioblastoma-related Immune Cells Reveals CD49d Expression Correlation with MRI parameters and Prognosis. Cho HR; Jeon H; Park CK; Park SH; Choi SH Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):16022. PubMed ID: 30375429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting Glioblastoma Recurrence by Early Changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value and Signal Intensity on FLAIR Images. Chang PD; Chow DS; Yang PH; Filippi CG; Lignelli A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 27726412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]