These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2739387)

  • 1. Development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 2739387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons.
    McDaniel DM; Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):686-93. PubMed ID: 1608261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gilmore C; Pusakulich KM
    Ear Hear; 1988 Aug; 9(4):198-207. PubMed ID: 3169400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of objective and subjective measures of speech intelligibility in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Rivera IM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 34(4):904-15. PubMed ID: 1956197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Revised Speech Intelligibility Rating (RSIR) test: listeners with normal hearing.
    Speaks C; Trine TD; Crain TR; Niccum N
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Jan; 110(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 8290305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of an articulation-index based model for predicting the effects of adaptive frequency response hearing aids.
    Fabry DA; Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):676-89. PubMed ID: 2273883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gilmore C
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):119S-126S. PubMed ID: 3678650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three hearing aid fittings using the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) Test.
    Surr RK; Fabry DA
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 2026286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility of selected passages from the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test.
    Beck WG; Speaks C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 36(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 8246473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listener-assessed intelligibility of hearing aid-processed speech.
    Punch JL; Howard MT
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 738919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Connected Speech Test version 3: audiovisual administration.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gilmore C; Pusakulich KM
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 2470629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: experts' opinions and naive normal-hearing listeners' performance.
    Hilkhuysen GL; Gaubitch N; Huckvale M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):404-15. PubMed ID: 23090965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pairwise listener preferences in hearing aid evaluation.
    Punch JL; Parker CA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):366-74. PubMed ID: 7300278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intelligibility ratings of continuous discourse: application to hearing aid selection.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Sep; 76(3):758-66. PubMed ID: 6491048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Speech Intelligibility Index and the pure-tone average as predictors of lexical ability in children fit with hearing AIDS.
    Stiles DJ; Bentler RA; McGregor KK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):764-78. PubMed ID: 22223888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.
    Arehart K; Souza P; Kates J; Lunner T; Pedersen MS
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 25985016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paired comparison judgments of relative intelligibility in noise.
    Studebaker GA; Bisset JD; Van Ort DM; Hoffnung SU
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 7108046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.