902 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27394432)
21. Can transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate with extended 14-core scheme improve the predictive accuracy of Gleason score and tumor site in prostate cancer treatment?
Dell'Atti L
J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1239-43. PubMed ID: 26537070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ADC Metrics From Multiparametric MRI: Histologic Downgrading of Gleason Score 9 or 10 Prostate Cancers Diagnosed at Nontargeted Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.
Sadoughi N; Krishna S; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W158-W165. PubMed ID: 29995495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis.
Scott S; Samaratunga H; Chabert C; Breckenridge M; Gianduzzo T
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():26-30. PubMed ID: 26260531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Nezolosky MD; Vastola ME; Labe SA; Boldbaatar N; King MT; Martin NE; Orio PF; Beard CJ; Hoffman KE; Trinh QD; Spratt DE; Feng FY; Nguyen PL
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28753811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7.
Serkin FB; Soderdahl DW; Cullen J; Chen Y; Hernandez J
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 19117774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.
Treurniet KM; Trudel D; Sykes J; Evans AJ; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 24403214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Elevated fatty acid synthase expression in prostate needle biopsy cores predicts upgraded Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Hamada S; Horiguchi A; Kuroda K; Ito K; Asano T; Miyai K; Iwaya K
Prostate; 2014 Jan; 74(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 24108439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer improves Gleason score assessment in favorable risk prostate cancer.
Kamrava M; Kishan AU; Margolis DJ; Huang J; Dorey F; Lieu P; Kupelian PA; Marks LS
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 26059510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.
Velez E; Fedorov A; Tuncali K; Olubiyi O; Allard CB; Kibel AS; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2154-2159. PubMed ID: 28293720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy].
Zuo Q; Zhang F; Huang Y; Ma LL; Lu M; Lu J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29263497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The proportion of free PSA and upgrading of biopsy Gleason score after radical prostatectomy.
Visapää H; Hotakainen K; Lundin J; Ala-Opas M; Stenman UH
Urol Int; 2010; 84(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 20299777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of >/=8.
Manoharan M; Bird VG; Kim SS; Civantos F; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2003 Oct; 92(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 14511029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.
Song W; Bang SH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Kim CK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29550198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
