These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27394674)

  • 1. Which estimates comprise optimal reporting in Systematic Reviews?
    Stovitz SD; Shrier I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():140. PubMed ID: 27394674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RE: Which estimates comprise optimal reporting in systematic reviews?
    Alonso-Coello P; Vernooij RW; Carrasco-Labra A; Vandvik P; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():140-141. PubMed ID: 28215276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
    Turpin DL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals.
    Shea B; Moher D; Graham I; Pham B; Tugwell P
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Mar; 25(1):116-29. PubMed ID: 11868441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting of systematic reviews: the challenge of genetic association studies.
    Khoury MJ; Little J; Higgins J; Ioannidis JP; Gwinn M
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jun; 4(6):e211. PubMed ID: 17593896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration.
    Welch V; Petticrew M; Petkovic J; Moher D; Waters E; White H; Tugwell P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():68-89. PubMed ID: 26348799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist.
    Guise JM; Butler ME; Chang C; Viswanathan M; Pigott T; Tugwell P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():43-50. PubMed ID: 28720516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Overviews - status quo, potentials and perspectives].
    Pieper D; Büchter RB; Antoine SL; Eikermann M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):592-6. PubMed ID: 24315329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updated method guidelines for cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews and metaanalyses.
    Ghogomu EA; Maxwell LJ; Buchbinder R; Rader T; Pardo Pardo J; Johnston RV; Christensen RD; Rutjes AW; Winzenberg TM; Singh JA; Zanoli G; Wells GA; Tugwell P;
    J Rheumatol; 2014 Feb; 41(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 24293581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)].
    Walther S; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1106-10. PubMed ID: 22144064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Vrabel M
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2015 Sep; 42(5):552-4. PubMed ID: 26302284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
    Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
    Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 19723669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Harms M
    Physiotherapy; 2009 Dec; 95(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 19892087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
    Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Principles in the Evaluation of Systematic Reviews.
    Haber SL; Fairman KA; Sclar DA
    Pharmacotherapy; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1077-87. PubMed ID: 26598099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine.
    Junhua Z; Hongcai S; Xiumei G; Boli Z; Yaozu X; Hongbo C; Ming R
    J Altern Complement Med; 2007 Oct; 13(8):797-805. PubMed ID: 17983335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge.
    McKenzie JE; Brennan SE
    Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 6(1):185. PubMed ID: 28886726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.