186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27395057)
1. Region Specific Differences of Claudin-5 Expression in Pediatric Intracranial Ependymomas: Potential Prognostic Role in Supratentorial Cases.
Virág J; Haberler C; Baksa G; Piurkó V; Hegedüs Z; Reiniger L; Bálint K; Chocholous M; Kiss A; Lotz G; Glasz T; Schaff Z; Garami M; Hegedűs B
Pathol Oncol Res; 2017 Apr; 23(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 27395057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supra- and infratentorial pediatric ependymomas differ significantly in NeuN, p75 and GFAP expression.
Hagel C; Treszl A; Fehlert J; Harder J; von Haxthausen F; Kern M; von Bueren AO; Kordes U
J Neurooncol; 2013 Apr; 112(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 23371454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chromosome 1q gain and tenascin-C expression are candidate markers to define different risk groups in pediatric posterior fossa ependymoma.
Araki A; Chocholous M; Gojo J; Dorfer C; Czech T; Heinzl H; Dieckmann K; Ambros IM; Ambros PF; Slavc I; Haberler C
Acta Neuropathol Commun; 2016 Aug; 4(1):88. PubMed ID: 27550150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Natural history and role of radiation in patients with supratentorial and infratentorial WHO grade II ependymomas: results from a population-based study.
Aizer AA; Ancukiewicz M; Nguyen PL; Macdonald SM; Yock TI; Tarbell NJ; Shih HA; Loeffler JS; Oh KS
J Neurooncol; 2013 Dec; 115(3):411-9. PubMed ID: 24057324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of H3K27me3 in children with ependymoma.
Han Z; Kang P; Zhang H; Liao Z; Li C; Gong J; Liu W; Tian Y
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2020 Mar; 67(3):e28121. PubMed ID: 31850684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The transcription factor evi-1 is overexpressed, promotes proliferation, and is prognostically unfavorable in infratentorial ependymomas.
Koos B; Bender S; Witt H; Mertsch S; Felsberg J; Beschorner R; Korshunov A; Riesmeier B; Pfister S; Paulus W; Hasselblatt M
Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Jun; 17(11):3631-7. PubMed ID: 21493867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intracranial ependymomas: molecular insights and translation to treatment.
Lester A; McDonald KL
Brain Pathol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31433520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ependymoma.
Reni M; Gatta G; Mazza E; Vecht C
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2007 Jul; 63(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 17482475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of chromosome 1q gain in intracranial ependymomas.
Rajeshwari M; Sharma MC; Kakkar A; Nambirajan A; Suri V; Sarkar C; Singh M; Saran RK; Gupta RK
J Neurooncol; 2016 Apr; 127(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 26725097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinct disease-risk groups in pediatric supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas.
Godfraind C; Kaczmarska JM; Kocak M; Dalton J; Wright KD; Sanford RA; Boop FA; Gajjar A; Merchant TE; Ellison DW
Acta Neuropathol; 2012 Aug; 124(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 22526017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intracranial ependymomas in childhood. Survival and functional results of 47 cases.
Pierre-Kahn A; Hirsch JF; Roux FX; Renier D; Sainte-Rose C
Childs Brain; 1983; 10(3):145-56. PubMed ID: 6872622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Merlin expression in pediatric anaplastic ependymomas real time PCR study.
Buccoliero AM; Castiglione F; Rossi Degl'Innocenti D; Sardi I; Genitori L; Taddei GL
Fetal Pediatr Pathol; 2010; 29(4):245-54. PubMed ID: 20594149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Altered MicroRNA Expression Is Associated with Tumor Grade, Molecular Background and Outcome in Childhood Infratentorial Ependymoma.
Zakrzewska M; Fendler W; Zakrzewski K; Sikorska B; Grajkowska W; Dembowska-Bagińska B; Filipek I; Stefańczyk Ł; Liberski PP
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158464. PubMed ID: 27390862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuronal differentiation distinguishes supratentorial and infratentorial childhood ependymomas.
Andreiuolo F; Puget S; Peyre M; Dantas-Barbosa C; Boddaert N; Philippe C; Mauguen A; Grill J; Varlet P
Neuro Oncol; 2010 Nov; 12(11):1126-34. PubMed ID: 20615923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognosis by tumor location in adults with intracranial ependymomas.
Sayegh ET; Aranda D; Kim JM; Oh T; Parsa AT; Oh MC
J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 21(12):2096-101. PubMed ID: 25037313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Infratentorial ependymomas: prognostic factors and outcome analysis in a multi-center retrospective series of 106 adult patients.
Guyotat J; Metellus P; Giorgi R; Barrie M; Jouvet A; Fevre-Montange M; Chinot O; Durand A; Figarella-Branger D
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2009 Aug; 151(8):947-60. PubMed ID: 19499166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review of treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with intracranial ependymomas.
Cage TA; Clark AJ; Aranda D; Gupta N; Sun PP; Parsa AT; Auguste KI
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2013 Jun; 11(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 23540528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of relevant prognostic histopathologic features in 69 intracranial ependymomas, excluding myxopapillary ependymomas and subependymomas.
Kurt E; Zheng PP; Hop WC; van der Weiden M; Bol M; van den Bent MJ; Avezaat CJ; Kros JM
Cancer; 2006 Jan; 106(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 16342252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nucleolin overexpression is associated with an unfavorable outcome for ependymoma: a multifactorial analysis of 176 patients.
Chen C; Chen L; Yao Y; Qin Z; Chen H
J Neurooncol; 2016 Mar; 127(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 26615563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supratentorial extraventricular ependymomas: A retrospective study focused on long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.
Wang M; Zhang R; Liu X; Li D; Qiu C; Zhao P; Zuo Y; Zhang P; Wang J; Sun H
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 165():1-6. PubMed ID: 29253745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
