These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2739545)

  • 1. [A method of determining the feedback resistance of artificial heart valves].
    Zaiko VM; Lupachev SP; Volyntsev PA; Dolgopolov RV
    Med Tekh; 1989; (1):30-2. PubMed ID: 2739545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Bio-artificial organs: cardiac applications].
    Flameng W
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 15553097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indication of cavitation in mechanical heart valve patients.
    Andersen TS; Johansen P; Paulsen PK; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov; 12(6):790-6. PubMed ID: 14658822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
    Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Carotid pulse curve in patients with prosthetic aortic heart valves (author's transl)].
    Schwab W; Raas E
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1980 Jul; 130(13-14):475-8. PubMed ID: 7424036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro durability of Hancock Model 242 porcine heart valve.
    Clark RE; Swanson WM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Aug; 78(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 572454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Results of heart valve replacement: especially on the selection criteria for valve prostheses and on a new anticoagulation regimen].
    Sugimura S; Ozawa K; Iriyama T; Hattori Y; Watanabe K; Sai N
    Rinsho Kyobu Geka; 1989 Jun; 9(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 9301929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
    Horstkotte D
    Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of fixation back pressure and antimineralization treatment on the morphology of porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves.
    Flomenbaum MA; Schoen FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 105(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 8419696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
    Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and Laser Doppler Anemometry velocity measurements downstream of replacement heart valves: implications for in vivo assessment of prosthetic valve function.
    Fontaine AA; Heinrich RS; Walker PG; Pedersen EM; Scheidegger MB; Boesiger P; Walton SP; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 8834728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical problems of biological and mechanical valves--comparative study of mitral valve replacement with a biological valve and aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve].
    Komatsu S; Tanaka N
    Rinsho Kyobu Geka; 1981; 1(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 7052583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
    Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.