These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27395825)

  • 21. Meat packaging, preservation, and marketing implications: Consumer preferences in an emerging economy.
    Wang HH; Chen J; Bai J; Lai J
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():300-307. PubMed ID: 30007176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
    Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meat the challenge: Segmentation and profiling of Japanese beef mince and its substitutes consumers.
    Washio T; Saijo M; Ito H; Takeda KI; Ohashi T
    Meat Sci; 2023 Mar; 197():109047. PubMed ID: 36469985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Imported Milk: Based on Shanghai, China.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31905802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of sequential information on consumers' willingness to pay for credence food attributes.
    Botelho A; Dinis I; Lourenço-Gomes L; Moreira J; Costa Pinto L; Simões O
    Appetite; 2017 Nov; 118():17-25. PubMed ID: 28760349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Japanese consumers' valuation of domestic beef after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
    Sawada M; Aizaki H; Sato K
    Appetite; 2014 Sep; 80():225-35. PubMed ID: 24859113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland.
    Żakowska-Biemans S; Pieniak Z; Gutkowska K; Wierzbicki J; Cieszyńska K; Sajdakowska M; Kosicka-Gębska M
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():105-113. PubMed ID: 27865127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spanish, French and British consumers' acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers' beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price.
    Realini CE; Font i Furnols M; Sañudo C; Montossi F; Oliver MA; Guerrero L
    Meat Sci; 2013 Sep; 95(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 23644048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consumer preferences for beef with improved nutrient profile1.
    Flowers S; McFadden BR; Carr CC; Mateescu RG
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4699-4709. PubMed ID: 31628839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers.
    Slade P
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():428-437. PubMed ID: 29501683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Beef choice.
    Ngapo TM; Braña Varela D; Rubio Lozano MS
    Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():34-43. PubMed ID: 28750333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Organic food consumption in Poland: Motives and barriers.
    Bryła P
    Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():737-46. PubMed ID: 27417333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of marbling and shear force on consumers' willingness to pay for beef strip loin steaks.
    Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Koontz SR; Chapman PL; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):890-9. PubMed ID: 15753345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Emerging market for pork with animal welfare attribute in China: An ethical perspective.
    Liang Y; Xu Y; Lai D; Hua G; Huang D; Wang H; Li H; Han L
    Meat Sci; 2023 Jan; 195():108994. PubMed ID: 36240585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preferences for lamb meat: a choice experiment for Spanish consumers.
    Gracia A; de-Magistris T
    Meat Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 23747635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded, Argentine beef program.
    Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3302-7. PubMed ID: 15542477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do consumers prefer pasture-raised dual-purpose cattle when considering meat products? A hypothetical discrete choice experiment for the case of minced beef.
    Schulze M; Spiller A; Risius A
    Meat Sci; 2021 Jul; 177():108494. PubMed ID: 33780871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consumer Perception of Sustainability Attributes in Organic and Local Food.
    Annunziata A; Mariani A
    Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric; 2018; 9(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 29299996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.
    McCarthy SN; Henchion M; White A; Brandon K; Allen P
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():118-124. PubMed ID: 28522169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.