These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2739623)

  • 1. Comparison between continuous and discrete sources in the Paris system of implants.
    Paul JM; Philip PC; Brandenburg RW; Koch RF
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(3):414-24. PubMed ID: 2739623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the substitution of Ir-192 seed ribbons for wires in Paris system using dose nonuniformity ratio.
    Saw CB; Wu A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Feb; 25(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 8436534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brachytherapy implants with differently spaced Ir-192 seeds: a dosimetric study.
    Muller-Runkel R; Vijayakumar S
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):271-4. PubMed ID: 3628781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A dose homogeneity index for evaluating 192Ir interstitial breast implants.
    Wu A; Ulin K; Sternick ES
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 3352544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative dosimetry between iridium wires and seed ribbons.
    Marinello G; Valero M; Leung S; Pierquin B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Sep; 11(9):1733-9. PubMed ID: 4030441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dosimetry system for 192IR interstitial breast implants performed at the time of lumpectomy.
    Waterman FM; Mansfield CM; Komarnicky L; Anne PR; Corn B; Suntharalingam N
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):229-35. PubMed ID: 9054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reference dose rates for single- and double-plane 192Ir implants.
    Saw CB; Suntharalingam N
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 3405143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single and double plane implants: a comparison of the Manchester System with the Paris System.
    Gillin MT; Kline RW; Wilson JF; Cox JD
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1984 Jun; 10(6):921-5. PubMed ID: 6735776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of HDR interstitial breast implants planned by conventional and optimized CT-based dosimetry systems with respect to dose homogeneity and conformality.
    Major T; Fodor J; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Agoston P; Polgár C
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15702297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perineal template techniques for interstitial implantation of gynecological cancers using the Paris system of dosimetry.
    Leung S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Sep; 19(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 2211225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does inverse planning applied to Iridium192 high dose rate prostate brachytherapy improve the optimization of the dose afforded by the Paris system?
    Nickers P; Lenaerts E; Thissen B; Deneufbourg JM
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Feb; 74(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 15734200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy assessment of the superposition principle for evaluating dose distributions of elongated and curved 103Pd and 192Ir brachytherapy sources.
    Bannon EA; Yang Y; Rivard MJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2957-63. PubMed ID: 21815369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consequences of optimization in PDR brachytherapy--is a routine geometrical optimization recommendable?
    Berns C; Fritz P; Hensley FW; Wannenmacher M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1171-80. PubMed ID: 9169828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of directional interstitial sources to improve dosimetry in breast brachytherapy.
    Lin L; Patel RR; Thomadsen BR; Henderson DL
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 18293579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of basal dose rates in Paris system of interstitial implants.
    Saw CB; Wu A
    Med Dosim; 1992; 17(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 1388680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A nondivergent specification of the mean treatment dose in interstitial brachytherapy.
    Yu Y
    Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):905-9. PubMed ID: 8798176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First clinical experience with a remote afterloading system for low dose rate interstitial breast implants.
    Meertens H; Bartelink H; Minderhoud T
    Radiother Oncol; 1988 Apr; 11(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 3375463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 60cobalt and 192iridium sources in high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy.
    Richter J; Baier K; Flentje M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Apr; 184(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 18398582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of planar high-dose-rate implants.
    Zwicker RD; Arthur DW; Kavanagh BD; Mohan R; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1171-7. PubMed ID: 10421552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uniform analysis of dose distribution in interstitial brachytherapy dosimetry systems.
    Paul JM; Koch RF; Philip PC
    Radiother Oncol; 1988 Oct; 13(2):105-25. PubMed ID: 3201001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.