These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2739722)

  • 1. Scientific misconduct still an unknown.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1989 Jul; 340(6228):3. PubMed ID: 2739722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Congress explores the incidence of scientific fraud and misconduct.
    Harby K
    J Nucl Med; 1988 Sep; 29(9):1469-71. PubMed ID: 3411371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH change procedures for monitoring scientific misconduct.
    Palca J
    Nature; 1989 Feb; 337(6208):588. PubMed ID: 2918889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research fraud, public policy, and gun control.
    Lott JR
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5625):1505; author reply 1505. PubMed ID: 12791965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fraud in scientific research: of forging, cooking, and trimming.
    MD; 1982 Jun; 26(7):188-95, 199, 203 passim. PubMed ID: 10255662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On analyzing scientific fraud.
    Braunwald E
    Nature; 1987 Jan 15-21; 325(6101):215-6. PubMed ID: 3808020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
    Garfield E
    Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensuring scientific integrity.
    Nature; 1987 Jun 18-24; 327(6123):550. PubMed ID: 3600749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The research community's response to fraud.
    Simon JD
    J Nucl Med; 1988 Sep; 29(9):1470. PubMed ID: 3411372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US proposes new rules for dealing with misconduct.
    Palca J
    Nature; 1988 Sep; 335(6187):195. PubMed ID: 3412478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fraud in science: causes and remedies.
    Relman AS
    Sci Am; 1989 Apr; 260(4):126. PubMed ID: 2928763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific fraud.
    Starkey JD
    Nature; 1987 Jun 25-Jul 1; 327(6124):652. PubMed ID: 3600761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fraud in science.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jul; 287(6388):355-6. PubMed ID: 6409300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fraud, libel and the literature.
    Nature; 1987 Jan 15-21; 325(6101):181-2. PubMed ID: 3808008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fraud and science.
    Dworkin G
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 128():65-74. PubMed ID: 6634738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific fraud and scientific ethics.
    Weinstein D
    Conn Med; 1981 Oct; 45(10):655-8. PubMed ID: 7307510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):504. PubMed ID: 3200292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct.
    Hackett EJ
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):242-60. PubMed ID: 11653363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.