These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27398812)

  • 41. Atypia on breast core needle biopsies: reproducibility and significance.
    Darvishian F; Singh B; Simsir A; Ye W; Cangiarella JF
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 19667411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided core needle biopsy: frequency, final surgical outcome, and factors associated with underestimation.
    Mesurolle B; Perez JC; Azzumea F; Lemercier E; Xie X; Aldis A; Omeroglu A; Meterissian S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jun; 202(6):1389-94. PubMed ID: 24848840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cytological criteria for the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast.
    Bofin AM; Lydersen S; Hagmar BM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Oct; 31(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15452908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Is zero underestimation feasible? Extended Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in solid lesions - a blind study.
    Zografos GC; Zagouri F; Sergentanis TN; Koulocheri D; Nonni A; Oikonomou V; Domeyer P; Kotsani M; Fotiadis C; Bramis J
    World J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 5():53. PubMed ID: 17501997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Extent and histologic pattern of atypical ductal hyperplasia present on core needle biopsy specimens of the breast can predict ductal carcinoma in situ in subsequent excision.
    Wagoner MJ; Laronga C; Acs G
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jan; 131(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 19095574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Role of cytokeratin expression in differential diagnosis of intraductal proliferative lesions of breast].
    Zhang JL; Zhang HY; Wei B; Lang ZQ; Bu H
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 33(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 15363314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A useful immunohistochemical approach to evaluate intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and to predict their prognosis.
    Omi Y; Yamamoto T; Okamoto T; Obara T; Kobayashi M
    Histol Histopathol; 2011 Jan; 26(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21117029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast. Its diagnostic imaging and the role of percutaneous needle biopsy with a 14-gauge needle].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; di Loreto C; Puglisi F; Vasciaveo A
    Radiol Med; 1999 Sep; 98(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 10575441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is core needle biopsy superior to fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions?
    Masood S; Loya A; Khalbuss W
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jun; 28(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 12768640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Factors that impact the upgrading of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
    Gümüş H; Mills P; Gümüş M; Fish D; Jones S; Jones P; Devalia H; Sever A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 23019055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria.
    Schnitt SJ; Connolly JL; Tavassoli FA; Fechner RE; Kempson RL; Gelman R; Page DL
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1992 Dec; 16(12):1133-43. PubMed ID: 1463092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Second opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception.
    Geller BM; Nelson HD; Carney PA; Weaver DL; Onega T; Allison KH; Frederick PD; Tosteson AN; Elmore JG
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):955-60. PubMed ID: 25053542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Solid papillary ductal carcinoma in situ versus usual ductal hyperplasia in the breast: a potentially difficult distinction resolved by cytokeratin 5/6.
    Rabban JT; Koerner FC; Lerwill MF
    Hum Pathol; 2006 Jul; 37(7):787-93. PubMed ID: 16784976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of ductal lesions of breast].
    Di F; Wong NL
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 39(7):467-72. PubMed ID: 21055176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Breast pathology practice: most common problems in a consultation service.
    Putti TC; Pinder SE; Elston CW; Lee AH; Ellis IO
    Histopathology; 2005 Nov; 47(5):445-57. PubMed ID: 16241992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The use of Au@SiO2 shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for human breast cancer detection.
    Zheng C; Liang L; Xu S; Zhang H; Hu C; Bi L; Fan Z; Han B; Xu W
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2014 Sep; 406(22):5425-32. PubMed ID: 24958347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Understanding diagnostic variability in breast pathology: lessons learned from an expert consensus review panel.
    Allison KH; Reisch LM; Carney PA; Weaver DL; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Geller BM; Elmore JG
    Histopathology; 2014 Aug; 65(2):240-51. PubMed ID: 24511905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Needle core biopsy can reliably distinguish between benign and malignant papillary lesions of the breast.
    Carder PJ; Garvican J; Haigh I; Liston JC
    Histopathology; 2005 Mar; 46(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 15720418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Histopathological grading of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: validation of a web-based survey through intra-observer reproducibility analysis.
    Schuh F; Biazús JV; Resetkova E; Benfica CZ; Ventura Ade F; Uchoa D; Graudenz M; Edelweiss MI
    Diagn Pathol; 2015 Jul; 10():93. PubMed ID: 26159429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Underestimation Rate at MR Imaging-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study of 1509 Breast Biopsies.
    Verheyden C; Pages-Bouic E; Balleyguier C; Cherel P; Lepori D; Laffargue G; Doutriaux I; Jalaguier A; Poncelet E; Millet I; Thomassin-Naggara I; Taourel P
    Radiology; 2016 Dec; 281(3):708-719. PubMed ID: 27355898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.