214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27399059)
1. Economic evaluation study (CHEER-compliant): Cost-effectiveness analysis of RAS screening for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on the CALGB 80405 trial.
Zhou J; Zhao R; Wen F; Zhang P; Tang R; Chen H; Zhang J; Li Q
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(27):e3762. PubMed ID: 27399059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L
Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of
Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V
J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L
BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
Shankaran V; Ortendahl JD; Purdum AG; Bolinder B; Anene AM; Sun GH; Bentley TGK
Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 26398184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consequences of Biomarker Analysis on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab in Combination with FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Personalised Medicine at Work.
Harty G; Jarrett J; Jofre-Bonet M
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Aug; 16(4):515-525. PubMed ID: 29948926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Sequences of the Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors for Wild-Type KRAS Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Riesco-Martínez MC; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Mittmann N; Giotis A; Lien K; Wong WW; Chan KK
J Oncol Pract; 2016 Jun; 12(6):e710-23. PubMed ID: 27143148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Saudi Arabia.
Elsamany S; Elsisi GH; Mohamed Hassanin FA; Saleh K; Tashkandi E
Value Health Reg Issues; 2022 Mar; 28():67-75. PubMed ID: 34801961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.
Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T
Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS
J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phase II Randomized Trial of Sequential or Concurrent FOLFOXIRI-Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX-Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (STEAM).
Hurwitz HI; Tan BR; Reeves JA; Xiong H; Somer B; Lenz HJ; Hochster HS; Scappaticci F; Palma JF; Price R; Lee JJ; Nicholas A; Sommer N; Bendell J
Oncologist; 2019 Jul; 24(7):921-932. PubMed ID: 30552157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relevance of baseline carcinoembryonic antigen for first-line treatment against metastatic colorectal cancer with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab (FIRE-3 trial).
Holch JW; Ricard I; Stintzing S; Fischer von Weikersthal L; Decker T; Kiani A; Vehling-Kaiser U; Heintges T; Kahl C; Kullmann F; Scheithauer W; Moehler M; Jelas I; Modest DP; Westphalen CB; von Einem JC; Michl M; Heinemann V
Eur J Cancer; 2019 Jan; 106():115-125. PubMed ID: 30496943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of RAS screening before monoclonal antibodies therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer based on FIRE3 Study.
Wen F; Yang Y; Zhang P; Zhang J; Zhou J; Tang R; Chen H; Zheng H; Fu P; Li Q
Cancer Biol Ther; 2015; 16(11):1577-84. PubMed ID: 26418570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study-level meta-analysis of efficacy data from head-to-head first-line trials of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors versus bevacizumab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.
Heinemann V; Rivera F; O'Neil BH; Stintzing S; Koukakis R; Terwey JH; Douillard JY
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 67():11-20. PubMed ID: 27592068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. KRAS mutation testing of tumours in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Whiting P; Joore M; Armstrong N; Noake C; Ross J; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Oct; 18(62):1-132. PubMed ID: 25314637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomised open-label phase 3 trial.
Stintzing S; Modest DP; Rossius L; Lerch MM; von Weikersthal LF; Decker T; Kiani A; Vehling-Kaiser U; Al-Batran SE; Heintges T; Lerchenmüller C; Kahl C; Seipelt G; Kullmann F; Stauch M; Scheithauer W; Held S; Giessen-Jung C; Moehler M; Jagenburg A; Kirchner T; Jung A; Heinemann V;
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Oct; 17(10):1426-1434. PubMed ID: 27575024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
