165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27399312)
1. Data quality at the Singapore Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Fung JW; Lim SB; Zheng H; Ho WY; Lee BG; Chow KY; Lee HP
Cancer Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 43():76-86. PubMed ID: 27399312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Data quality at the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Dimitrova N; Parkin DM
Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 39(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 25914137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Larsen IK; Småstuen M; Johannesen TB; Langmark F; Parkin DM; Bray F; Møller B
Eur J Cancer; 2009 May; 45(7):1218-1231. PubMed ID: 19091545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness.
Sigurdardottir LG; Jonasson JG; Stefansdottir S; Jonsdottir A; Olafsdottir GH; Olafsdottir EJ; Tryggvadottir L
Acta Oncol; 2012 Sep; 51(7):880-9. PubMed ID: 22974093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry: an overview of completeness, timeliness, comparability and validity.
Moberger P; Sköldberg F; Birgisson H
Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1611-1621. PubMed ID: 30477372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.
Bray F; Parkin DM
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality measures of the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry indicate sound data quality for solid malignant tumours.
Leinonen MK; Miettinen J; Heikkinen S; Pitkäniemi J; Malila N
Eur J Cancer; 2017 May; 77():31-39. PubMed ID: 28350996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of data quality at the National Cancer Registry of Ukraine.
Ryzhov A; Bray F; Ferlay J; Fedorenko Z; Goulak L; Gorokh Y; Soumkina O; Znaor A
Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 53():156-165. PubMed ID: 29459256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Data Quality of Four New Population Based Cancer Registries (PBCRs) in Chandigarh and Punjab, North India- A Quality Control Study.
Bashar MA; Thakur JS; Budukh A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 May; 22(5):1421-1433. PubMed ID: 34048170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of data quality at the Hungarian National Cancer Registry, 2000-2019.
Wéber A; Mery L; Nagy P; Polgár C; Bray F; Kenessey I
Cancer Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 82():102306. PubMed ID: 36521336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Completeness of a newly implemented general cancer registry in northern France: Application of a three-source capture-recapture method.
Plouvier SD; Bernillon P; Ligier K; Theis D; Miquel PH; Pasquier D; Rivest LP
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2019 Jul; 67(4):239-245. PubMed ID: 31146902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Completeness and timeliness: Cancer registries could/should improve their performance.
Zanetti R; Schmidtmann I; Sacchetto L; Binder-Foucard F; Bordoni A; Coza D; Ferretti S; Galceran J; Gavin A; Larranaga N; Robinson D; Tryggvadottir L; Van Eycken E; Zadnik V; Coebergh JW; Rosso S
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1091-8. PubMed ID: 24393522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality assessment of a rural population-based cancer registry (PBCR) at Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India for the years 2017-18.
Shivshankar S; Sarade M; Bhojane S; Kolekar S; Patil S; Budukh A
Ecancermedicalscience; 2024; 18():1672. PubMed ID: 38439807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of data quality at the Gambia national cancer registry.
Shimakawa Y; Bah E; Wild CP; Hall AJ
Int J Cancer; 2013 Feb; 132(3):658-65. PubMed ID: 22618962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Completeness of cancer registry data in a small Iranian province: A capture-recapture approach.
Fararouei M; Marzban M; Shahraki G
Health Inf Manag; 2017 May; 46(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 27702791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of data quality in the Swedish National Register for Breast Cancer.
Löfgren L; Eloranta S; Krawiec K; Asterkvist A; Lönnqvist C; Sandelin K;
BMC Public Health; 2019 May; 19(1):495. PubMed ID: 31046737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Completeness, Comparability, Validity, and Timeliness in Cancer Registries: A Scoping Review.
Shokrizadeharani L; Batooli Z; Heydarian S; Sharif R; Ghaderkhany S; Tamehbidgoli M; Ataiejahanbegloo F; Hieber D; Kuhn P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 Jun; 305():160-163. PubMed ID: 37386985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Indicators of Data Quality at the Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug in Switzerland.
Wanner M; Matthes KL; Korol D; Dehler S; Rohrmann S
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():7656197. PubMed ID: 30009174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The completeness and timeliness of cancer registration and the implications for measuring cancer burden.
Donnelly C; Cairnduff V; Chen JJ; Kearney T; Fitzpatrick D; Fox C; Gavin A
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():101-107. PubMed ID: 28600946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Childhood cancer registration in New Zealand: A registry collaboration to assess and improve data quality.
Ballantine KR; Hanna S; Macfarlane S; Bradbeer P; Teague L; Hunter S; Cross S; Skeen J
Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 55():104-109. PubMed ID: 29902672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
