These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27399329)

  • 1. 2016: Reviewing for Radiology-Reporting Guidelines and Why We Use Them.
    Levine D; Kressel HY
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):659-62. PubMed ID: 27399329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peering Into Peer Review:
    Provenzale JM; Buch K; Filippi CG; Gaskill-Shipley M; Hacein-Bey L; Soares BP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 31670589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why should I review journal manuscripts?
    Munk PL; Murphy KJ; Nicolaou S; Klass D
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 Aug; 65(3):193. PubMed ID: 25063742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.
    Lamb CR; Mai W
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do reviewers affect the final outcome? Comparison of the quality of peer review and relative acceptance rates of submitted manuscripts.
    Kurihara Y; Colletti PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):468-70. PubMed ID: 23971437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.
    Provenzale JM; Stanley RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):848-54. PubMed ID: 16177399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lessons Learned From
    Provenzale JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):41-44. PubMed ID: 31670593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers.
    Dewey M; Levine D; Bossuyt PM; Kressel HY
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):3986-3995. PubMed ID: 30694365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does online submission of manuscripts improve efficiency?
    Govender P; Buckley O; McAuley G; O'Brien J; Torreggiani WC
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):231-4. PubMed ID: 19202995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "This Manuscript Was a Complete Waste of Time": Reviewer Etiquette Matters.
    Durning SJ; Sklar DP; Driessen EW; Maggio LA
    Acad Med; 2019 Jun; 94(6):744-745. PubMed ID: 31136334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revised Manuscript Submission Guidelines.
    Fain JA
    Diabetes Educ; 2014 Jul; 40(4):411. PubMed ID: 25049371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary.
    Allen LA; Ho PM
    Circ Heart Fail; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. JRCR - updated prescreening process for submissions.
    Talanow R
    J Radiol Case Rep; 2018 Jun; 12(6):1-5. PubMed ID: 30651911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology.
    Kliewer MA; Freed KS; DeLong DM; Pickhardt PJ; Provenzale JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1731-5. PubMed ID: 15908521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.
    Navalta JW; Lyons TS
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Dec; 34(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 21098383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Requirements for manuscript submission: what every author needs to know and comply with to facilitate the review process.
    Karabulut N
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 25751887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Not Available].
    Weber MA
    Rofo; 2024 May; 196(5):437-439. PubMed ID: 38387477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AJR reviewers: We need to continue to improve our education and monitoring methods!
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):1179-80. PubMed ID: 23701050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Online submission of manuscripts for the journal Die Radiologie].
    Radiologie (Heidelb); 2022 Nov; 62(11):899. PubMed ID: 36260148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer reviews. A peer reviewer's view.
    Welsby PD
    Postgrad Med J; 2020 Dec; 96(1142):725-727. PubMed ID: 32943475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.