287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27400081)
1. Role of Age and Myopia in Simultaneous Assessment of Corneal and Extraocular Tissue Stiffness by Air-Puff Applanation.
Matalia J; Francis M; Tejwani S; Dudeja G; Rajappa N; Sinha Roy A
J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 32(7):486-93. PubMed ID: 27400081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of Corneal Biomechanical Stiffness With Refractive Error and Ocular Biometry in a Pediatric Population.
Matalia J; Francis M; Gogri P; Panmand P; Matalia H; Sinha Roy A
Cornea; 2017 Oct; 36(10):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 28731878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Corneal Thickness After SMILE Affects Scheimpflug-based Dynamic Tonometry.
Fernández J; Rodríguez-Vallejo M; Martínez J; Tauste A; Piñero DP
J Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 32(12):821-828. PubMed ID: 27930792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal Viscous Properties Cannot Be Determined From Air-Puff Applanation.
Francis M; Matalia H; Nuijts RMMA; Haex B; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
J Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 35(11):730-736. PubMed ID: 31710375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in myopes and emmetropes using the Corvis ST.
Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K
Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 26893029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.
Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Bons JP; Hossain A; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
J Refract Surg; 2017 Apr; 33(4):266-273. PubMed ID: 28407167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ocular biomechanical metrics by CorVis ST in healthy Brazilian patients.
Valbon BF; Ambrósio R; Fontes BM; Luz A; Roberts CJ; Alves MR
J Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 30(7):468-73. PubMed ID: 24877553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters.
Rosa N; Lanza M; De Bernardo M; Signoriello G; Chiodini P
Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):335-9. PubMed ID: 24506466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Air puff induced corneal vibrations: theoretical simulations and clinical observations.
Han Z; Tao C; Zhou D; Sun Y; Zhou C; Ren Q; Roberts CJ
J Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 30(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 24763727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal Biomechanical Properties in High Myopia Measured by Dynamic Scheimpflug Imaging Technology.
He M; Wang W; Ding H; Zhong X
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Dec; 94(12):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 29135719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Influence factors and differences of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam system combined with Corvis ST].
Peng YS; Chen M; Tian L; Li H; Li DW; Zhang FF
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 32074821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes.
Huseynova T; Waring GO; Roberts C; Krueger RR; Tomita M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 157(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 24388837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ocular biomechanical response parameters in myopic and hyperopic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation analysis.
Roberts CJ; Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Mahmoud AM; Gobbe M; Lee L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):929-36. PubMed ID: 24857439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optical Quality in Keratoconus Is Associated With Corneal Biomechanics.
Shugyo A; Koh S; Inoue R; Ambrósio R; Miki A; Maeda N; Nishida K
Cornea; 2021 Oct; 40(10):1276-1281. PubMed ID: 33332893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical changes in the cornea following cataract surgery: A prospective assessment with the Corneal Visualisation Scheimpflug Technology.
Wallace HB; Misra SL; Li SS; McKelvie J
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 47(4):461-468. PubMed ID: 30474314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Alterations in intraocular pressure and the CorVis parameters after LASIK].
Anton A; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Wecker T; Lübke J; Heinzelmann S; Lapp T; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; Maier P
Ophthalmologe; 2017 May; 114(5):445-449. PubMed ID: 27620918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis.
Fujishiro T; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Murata H; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
J Glaucoma; 2020 Jun; 29(6):479-484. PubMed ID: 32134829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.
Pedersen IB; Bak-Nielsen S; Vestergaard AH; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 252(8):1329-35. PubMed ID: 24862302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
