These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27400687)

  • 1. Development of a protein-ligand-binding site prediction method based on interaction energy and sequence conservation.
    Tsujikawa H; Sato K; Wei C; Saad G; Sumikoshi K; Nakamura S; Terada T; Shimizu K
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2016 Sep; 17(2-3):39-49. PubMed ID: 27400687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Highly accurate method for ligand-binding site prediction in unbound state (apo) protein structures.
    Morita M; Nakamura S; Shimizu K
    Proteins; 2008 Nov; 73(2):468-79. PubMed ID: 18452211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
    Laurie AT; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction.
    Huang B
    OMICS; 2009 Aug; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 19645590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting small ligand binding sites in proteins using backbone structure.
    Bordner AJ
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(24):2865-71. PubMed ID: 18940825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation.
    Huang B; Schroeder M
    BMC Struct Biol; 2006 Sep; 6():19. PubMed ID: 16995956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites.
    Neuvirth H; Raz R; Schreiber G
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 338(1):181-99. PubMed ID: 15050833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of ligand binding sites using homologous structures and conservation at CASP8.
    Wass MN; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):147-51. PubMed ID: 19626715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amino Acids in Nine Ligand-Prefer Ramachandran Regions.
    Cao C; Wang L; Chen X; Zou S; Wang G; Xu S
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():757495. PubMed ID: 26491686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces.
    Burgoyne NJ; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(11):1335-42. PubMed ID: 16522669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of ligand-receptor binding thermodynamics by free energy force field three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis: applications to a set of glucose analogue inhibitors of glycogen phosphorylase.
    Venkatarangan P; Hopfinger AJ
    J Med Chem; 1999 Jun; 42(12):2169-79. PubMed ID: 10377222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From fold predictions to function predictions: automation of functional site conservation analysis for functional genome predictions.
    Zhang B; Rychlewski L; Pawłowski K; Fetrow JS; Skolnick J; Godzik A
    Protein Sci; 1999 May; 8(5):1104-15. PubMed ID: 10338021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of functional sites by analysis of sequence and structure conservation.
    Panchenko AR; Kondrashov F; Bryant S
    Protein Sci; 2004 Apr; 13(4):884-92. PubMed ID: 15010543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A web server for analysis, comparison and prediction of protein ligand binding sites.
    Singh H; Srivastava HK; Raghava GP
    Biol Direct; 2016 Mar; 11(1):14. PubMed ID: 27016210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic structure, binding energy, and solvation structure of the streptavidin-biotin supramolecular complex: ONIOM and 3D-RISM study.
    Li Q; Gusarov S; Evoy S; Kovalenko A
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jul; 113(29):9958-67. PubMed ID: 19545155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
    Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discarding functional residues from the substitution table improves predictions of active sites within three-dimensional structures.
    Gong S; Blundell TL
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Oct; 4(10):e1000179. PubMed ID: 18833291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MIonSite: Ligand-specific prediction of metal ion-binding sites via enhanced AdaBoost algorithm with protein sequence information.
    Qiao L; Xie D
    Anal Biochem; 2019 Feb; 566():75-88. PubMed ID: 30414728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preparation and refinement of model protein-ligand complexes.
    Orry AJ; Abagyan R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 857():351-73. PubMed ID: 22323230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.