These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27400731)

  • 1. Spine loading during the application and removal of lifting slings: the effects of patient weight, bed height and work method.
    Nagavarapu S; Lavender SA; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):636-648. PubMed ID: 27400731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumbosacral loads in bedmaking.
    Milburn PD; Barrett RS
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Jun; 30(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 10327090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subject-specific regression equations to estimate lower spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric static lifting.
    Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; El Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109550. PubMed ID: 31932024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 20850750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks performed in restricted workspaces.
    Elfeituri FE
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2001; 7(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 11543701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of a vacuum lifting system in reducing spinal load during airline baggage handling.
    Lu ML; Dufour JS; Weston EB; Marras WS
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():247-252. PubMed ID: 29866315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One versus two-handed lifting and lowering: lumbar spine loads and recommended one-handed limits protecting the lower back.
    Weston EB; Aurand AM; Dufour JS; Knapik GG; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2020 Apr; 63(4):505-521. PubMed ID: 32024437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of lumbar spine and muscle loading between male and female workers during box transfers.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():76-85. PubMed ID: 30286979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Brandon SCE; Robertson WSP; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unilateral ankle immobilization alters the kinematics and kinetics of lifting.
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Clark JM; Maly MR; Callaghan JP
    Work; 2014; 47(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 23324721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying interactive effects of task demands in lifting on estimates of in vivo low back joint loads.
    Gooyers CE; Beach TAC; Frost DM; Howarth SJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():203-210. PubMed ID: 29122191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M; Luttmann A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spine loading as a function of gender.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Jorgensen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2514-20. PubMed ID: 12435984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carrying and spine loading.
    Rose JD; Mendel E; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(11):1722-32. PubMed ID: 24073718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of six quantitative lifting tools to estimate spine loads during static activities.
    Rajaee MA; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Schmidt H
    Appl Ergon; 2015 May; 48():22-32. PubMed ID: 25683528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbar spinal loads vary with body height and weight.
    Han KS; Rohlmann A; Zander T; Taylor WR
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Jul; 35(7):969-77. PubMed ID: 23040051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.