These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27400731)

  • 21. Regression models for predicting peak and continuous three-dimensional spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks.
    Fathallah FA; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 10665206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vivo measurement of lumbar foramen during axial loading using a compression device and computed tomography.
    Iwata T; Miyamoto K; Hioki A; Ohashi M; Inoue N; Shimizu K
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Jul; 26(5):E177-82. PubMed ID: 23381186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
    Behjati M; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of load mass and position on the dynamic loading of the knees, shoulders and lumbar spine during lifting: a musculoskeletal modelling approach.
    Skals S; Bláfoss R; de Zee M; Andersen LL; Andersen MS
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103491. PubMed ID: 34126573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Bed Feature to Assist in Turning and Laterally Repositioning Patients.
    Wiggermann N
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):748-57. PubMed ID: 26715690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads - Evaluation of NIOSH criterion.
    Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110024. PubMed ID: 32961423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The assessment of material handling strategies in dealing with sudden loading: the effects of load handling position on trunk biomechanics.
    Ning X; Zhou J; Dai B; Jaridi M
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1399-405. PubMed ID: 24766903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pressure ulcer risk of patient handling sling use.
    Peterson MJ; Kahn JA; Kerrigan MV; Gutmann JM; Harrow JJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 26237005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lift performance and lumbar loading in standing and seated lifts.
    Middleton KJ; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ
    Ergonomics; 2016 Sep; 59(9):1242-50. PubMed ID: 26772388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Severe obesity effect on low back biomechanical stress of manual load lifting.
    Singh D; Park W; Hwang D; Levy MS
    Work; 2015 Jun; 51(2):337-48. PubMed ID: 25248524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Test-retest repeatability of lumbar sagittal alignment and disc height measurements with or without axial loading: a computed tomography study.
    Hioki A; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K; Inoue N
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Apr; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 21430497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.
    Marras WS; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of psychosocial stress, gender, and personality on mechanical loading of the lumbar spine.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Heaney CA; Maronitis AB; Allread WG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Dec; 25(23):3045-54. PubMed ID: 11145816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Manual material handling in the supermarket sector. Part 2: Knee, spine and shoulder joint reaction forces.
    Skals S; Bláfoss R; Andersen LL; Andersen MS; de Zee M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Apr; 92():103345. PubMed ID: 33444883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spinal loading and lift style in confined vertical space.
    Weston EB; Dufour JS; Lu ML; Marras WS
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Apr; 84():103021. PubMed ID: 31987509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fatigue failure in shear loading of porcine lumbar spine segments.
    van Dieën JH; van der Veen A; van Royen BJ; Kingma I
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):E494-8. PubMed ID: 16816749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.