151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2740096)
1. A clinical comparison of image quality and patient exposure reduction in panoramic radiography with heavy metal filtration.
Kapa SF; Tyndall DA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 2740096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of x-radiation doses between conventional and rare earth panoramic radiographic techniques.
Skoczylas LJ; Preece JW; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Waggener RG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 2594329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rare earth screens for panoramic radiography.
Hurlburt CE; Coggins LJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):451-4. PubMed ID: 6584845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of rare earth filtration on patient exposure, dose reduction, and image quality in oral panoramic radiology.
Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
Health Phys; 1987 Jan; 52(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 3804740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exposure reduction in cephalometric radiology: a comprehensive approach.
Tyndall DA; Matteson SR; Soltmann RE; Hamilton TL; Proffit WR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 May; 93(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 3163219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rare earth filters for intraoral radiography: exposure reduction as a function of kV(p) with comparisons of image quality.
Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 May; 118(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 2715547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kodak T-Mat G film in rotational panoramic radiography.
Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 3459998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of rare earth intensifying screens in cephalometric radiography.
Stathopoulos V; Poulton DR
Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2180348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plain radiography with a rare-earth screen: comparison with calcium tungstate screen.
Picus D; McAlister WH; Smith E; Rodewald S; Jost RG; Evens RG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 6333800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography.
Cohen G; Wagner LK; McDaniel DL; Robinson LH
Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 6729110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A rare earth screen-film system for dental panoramic radiography.
Keur JJ
Aust Dent J; 1983 Apr; 28(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 6577821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality and patient dose for different screen-film combinations.
Guibelalde E; Fernández JM; Vañó E; Llorca A; Ruiz MJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):166-73. PubMed ID: 8130979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rare earth filtration: spectral distributions, exposure reduction and image quality effects for panoramic radiography.
Tyndall DA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1987; 16(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3472971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage.
Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP
Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative study of screen-film combinations used in conventional radiography].
Malchair F; Longtain F; Gordenne W
J Belge Radiol; 1988; 71(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 3215896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Will the new highly intensifying film-screen combination of the Kodak T-MAT G/Lanex Regular meet the qualitative requirements of the lateral teleroentgenogram and orthopantomogram?].
Schulz D; Bührmann K; Plein-Jakobs E; Jakobs W
Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1988 Jun; 49(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 3165364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of rare-earth imaging systems in panoramic radiography.
Gratt BM; White SC; Packard FL; Petersson AR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Oct; 58(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 6593679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
