BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2740096)

  • 21. Rare-earth screens versus calcium tungstate screens.
    Wilson RA
    Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):288-9. PubMed ID: 6828754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 9117763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exposure reduction in panoramic radiography.
    Kapa SF; Platin E
    Radiol Technol; 1990; 62(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 2259717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A new rare earth intensifying screen: lanthanum oxybromide (Quanta III - Dupont): relative speed, resolution and image quality (author's transl)].
    Bergamini C; Laudicina L; Marengo M; Pavlica P; Viglietta G; Zanini M
    Radiol Med; 1980 Oct; 66(10):699-704. PubMed ID: 7221029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reduction of body doses in rotational panoramic radiography by means of reduced beam width in combination with rare earth intensifying screens.
    Aagaard A; Sewerin I
    Scand J Dent Res; 1986 Dec; 94(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 3468601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision and Fuji Super HR-S panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kitagawa H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 9720103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Exposure reduction and image quality for pantomographic radiography.
    Tyndall DA; Bedsole SM
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 59(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 3659339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Image resolution in the midsagittal plane of the Orthopantomograph-10 using Lanex regular and T-Mat G screen-film combination.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Oct; 74(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 1408031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ultra-low-dose routine pediatric radiography utilizing a rare-earth filter.
    Wesenberg RL; Amundson GM; Mueller DL; Coupland SG
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1987 Sep; 38(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 2958463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
    D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rare-earth and calcium tungstate intensifying screens, a comparative study of relative speed, radiation doses and resolving power.
    de Carvalho A; Jørgensen J
    Rofo; 1978 Mar; 128(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 147838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rare-earth filters in panoramic radiography: a means of reducing patient dose without compromising image quality.
    Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3460901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiation dose reduction in panoramic radiography. Orthopantomograph Model OP 3 modified for rare earth intensifying screens.
    Forsgren L; Julin P
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):225-31. PubMed ID: 6963005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Resolution of several screen-film combinations in rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Morris CR; Tronje G; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 3459994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A sensitometric comparison of Fuji Super HR-G and Kodak T-mat G panoramic films.
    Benson BW; Frederiksen NL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 May; 79(5):646-8. PubMed ID: 7600231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The reduction of x-ray exposure in dental practice using rare-earth screen--fast film combinations.
    Greig DG
    Br Dent J; 1983 Jul; 155(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 6577879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I. Absorbed doses to critical organs.
    Underhill TE; Chilvarquer I; Kimura K; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Preece JW; Barnwell G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jul; 66(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 3165508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The evaluation of high-speed screen/film combinations in cephalometric radiography.
    Kimura K; Langland OE; Biggerstaff RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Dec; 92(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 3479894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.