145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27401033)
1. Impact of the extent of extraprostatic extension defined by Epstein's method in patients with negative surgical margins and negative lymph node invasion.
Maubon T; Branger N; Bastide C; Lonjon G; Harvey-Bryan KA; Validire P; Giusiano S; Rossi D; Cathelineau X; Rozet F
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Sep; 19(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 27401033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: different parameters correlated to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
van Veggel BA; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA
Histopathology; 2011 Oct; 59(4):692-702. PubMed ID: 22014050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between the extent of extraprostatic extension and survival following radical prostatectomy.
Jeong BC; Chalfin HJ; Lee SB; Feng Z; Epstein JI; Trock BJ; Partin AW; Humphreys E; Walsh PC; Han M
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):342-6. PubMed ID: 24968968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostatic carcinoma: is its proximity to the surgical margin or Gleason score important?
Gupta R; O'Connell R; Haynes AM; Stricker PD; Barrett W; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2015 Sep; 116(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 25138271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical significance of in-depth pathological assessment of extraprostatic extension and margin status in radical prostatectomies for prostate cancer.
Chan SM; Garcia FJ; Chin JL; Moussa M; Gabril MY
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2011 Dec; 14(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 21502968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma.
Cheng L; Darson MF; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Myers RP; Bostwick DG
Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1775-82. PubMed ID: 10547551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the cut-off values of tumor diameter, degree of extraprostatic extension, and extent of surgical margin positivity with regard to biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Kir G; Arikan EA; Seneldir H; Ankarali H; Oznergiz S; Olgun ZC; Yildirim A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44():151431. PubMed ID: 31837592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radial distance of extraprostatic extension measured by ocular micrometer is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence: A new proposal for the substaging of pT3a prostate cancer.
Sung MT; Lin H; Koch MO; Davidson DD; Cheng L
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 17255778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk stratification of patients with extraprostatic extension and negative lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: identifying optimal candidates for adjuvant therapy.
Eisenberg MS; Karnes RJ; Kaushik D; Rangel L; Bergstralh EJ; Boorjian SA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1735-41. PubMed ID: 23727312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of Anterior and Lateral Extraprostatic Extensions with Base-Positive Resection Margins in Prostate Cancer.
Kang YJ; Abalajon MJ; Jang WS; Kwon JK; Yoon CY; Lee JY; Cho KS; Ham WS; Choi YD
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158922. PubMed ID: 27391650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Ritch CR; You C; May AT; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Penson DF; Chang SS; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Barocas DA
Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1309-15. PubMed ID: 24746665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging.
Ouzzane A; Rozet F; Salas RS; Galiano M; Barret E; Prapotnich D; Cathelineau X
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):586-91. PubMed ID: 23889763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk and timing of biochemical recurrence in pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margin - A multicenter study.
Karl A; Buchner A; Tympner C; Kirchner T; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Ganzer R; Wieland W; Eder F; Hofstädter F; Schilling D; Sievert KD; Stenzl A; Scharpf M; Fend F; Vom Dorp F; Rübben H; Schmid KW; Porres-Knoblauch D; Heidenreich A; Hangarter B; Knüchel-Clarke R; Rogenhofer M; Wullich B; Hartmann A; Comploj E; Pycha A; Hanspeter E; Pehrke D; Sauter G; Graefen M; Gratzke C; Stief C; Wiegel T; Haese A
Radiother Oncol; 2015 Jul; 116(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 26138059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients.
Mauermann J; Fradet V; Lacombe L; Dujardin T; Tiguert R; Tetu B; Fradet Y
Eur Urol; 2013 Jul; 64(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22901983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of lymphovascular invasion on lymph node metastasis for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with negative resection margin.
Kang YJ; Kim HS; Jang WS; Kwon JK; Yoon CY; Lee JY; Cho KS; Ham WS; Choi YD
BMC Cancer; 2017 May; 17(1):321. PubMed ID: 28482884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
