BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27401478)

  • 1. Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Kawano K; Tsuda N; Nishio S; Yonemoto K; Tasaki K; Tasaki R; Ushijima K
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Sep; 27(5):e54. PubMed ID: 27401478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Value of endocervical margin and high-risk human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Kong TW; Son JH; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Ryu HS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25284039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
    Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
    Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The appropriate cone depth to avoid endocervical margin involvement is dependent on age and disease severity.
    Bae HS; Chung YW; Kim T; Lee KW; Song JY
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 23034067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should attention be paid to the cone depth in the fully visible transformation zone? Retrospective analysis of 517 patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
    Giannella L; Delli Carpini G; Di Giuseppe J; Gardella B; Bogani G; Monti E; Liverani CA; Roncella E; Raspagliesi F; Spinillo A; Vercellini P; Ciavattini A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 36263898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
    Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
    Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
    Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
    Shaco-Levy R; Eger G; Dreiher J; Benharroch D; Meirovitz M
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24300540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
    An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
    Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
    Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Lee SM; Yoo CW; Kang S; Park SY; Seo SS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Predictors of residual lesion in cervix after conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive cervical cancer].
    Tan XJ; Wu M; Lang JH; Ma SQ; Shen K; Yang J
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19489237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extensive lesions and a positive cone margin are strong predictors of residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for squamous intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or 3 study design.
    Peng H; Liu W; Jiang J; Du H
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 37641051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.
    Montanari E; Grimm C; Schwameis R; Kuessel L; Polterauer S; Paternostro C; Husslein H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 29602979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
    Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
    Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive cone biopsy specimen margins in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.
    Boardman LA; Peipert JF; Hogan JW; Cooper AS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 181(6):1395-9. PubMed ID: 10601919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
    Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.