These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2740199)

  • 1. Amount and duration of attentional demands during visual search.
    Madden DJ; Allen PA
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jun; 45(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 2740199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerosity estimates for attended and unattended items in visual search.
    Kelley TD; Cassenti DN; Marusich LR; Ghirardelli TG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1336-1351. PubMed ID: 28321798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age differences and similarities in the improvement of controlled search.
    Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7128659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional demands of visual word recognition.
    Herdman CM; Dobbs AR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 2522522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search.
    Huang L; Pashler H
    Cognition; 2005 Jan; 94(3):B101-11. PubMed ID: 15617666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing is affected by demands in memory search but not by task switching.
    Fortin C; Schweickert R; Gaudreault R; Viau-Quesnel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):580-95. PubMed ID: 20515190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search without attentional displacement.
    Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):9.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of central attention in retrieval from visual short-term memory.
    Magen H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):423-430. PubMed ID: 27352900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Secondary task modality, expectancy, and the measurement of attentional capacity.
    Proctor RW; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 528962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses.
    Wolfe JM; O'Neill P; Bennett SC
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Jan; 60(1):140-56. PubMed ID: 9503918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In search of remembrance: evidence for memory in visual search.
    Kristjánsson A
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Jul; 11(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 11273394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?
    Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Michod KO
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):955-64. PubMed ID: 17306854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resources and dual-task performance; resource allocation versus task integration.
    Donk M; Sanders AF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1989 Dec; 72(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 2618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An adaptive (tracking) procedure for measuring visual search.
    Matin E; Boff KR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Feb; 70(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 2326124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional switches and dual-task interference.
    Ettwig JF; Bronkhorst AW
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118216. PubMed ID: 25730112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional demands for demonstrating deficits following intrabasalis infusions of 192 IgG-saporin.
    Burk JA; Lowder MW; Altemose KE
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 195(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 18840475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clear distinction between preattentive and attentive process in schizophrenia by visual search performance.
    Tanaka G; Mori S; Inadomi H; Hamada Y; Ohta Y; Ozawa H
    Psychiatry Res; 2007 Jan; 149(1-3):25-31. PubMed ID: 17123633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation.
    Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.