196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27402052)
1. A dynamic quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy to measure surgical outcomes.
Driessen SR; Van Zwet EW; Haazebroek P; Sandberg EM; Blikkendaal MD; Twijnstra AR; Jansen FW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):754.e1-754.e8. PubMed ID: 27402052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dynamic quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy to measure surgical outcomes.
Driessen SR; Van Zwet EW; Haazebroek P; Sandberg EM; Blikkendaal MD; Twijnstra AR; Jansen FW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 27403847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital versus individual surgeon's performance in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Driessen SR; Wallwiener M; Taran FA; Cohen SL; Kraemer B; Wallwiener CW; van Zwet EW; Brucker SY; Jansen FW
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Jan; 295(1):111-117. PubMed ID: 27628752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of risk factors in minimally invasive surgery: a prospective multicenter study.
Driessen SRC; Sandberg EM; Rodrigues SP; van Zwet EW; Jansen FW
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jun; 31(6):2467-2473. PubMed ID: 27800588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Case-Mix Variables and Predictors for Outcomes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.
Driessen SR; Sandberg EM; la Chapelle CF; Twijnstra AR; Rhemrev JP; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 26611613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Twijnstra AR; Blikkendaal MD; van Zwet EW; van Kesteren PJ; de Kroon CD; Jansen FW
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 119(4):700-8. PubMed ID: 22395145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysterectomies in Finland in 1990-2012: comparison of outcomes between trainees and specialists.
Jokinen E; Brummer T; Jalkanen J; Fraser J; Heikkinen AM; Mäkinen J; Sjöberg J; Tomàs E; Mikkola TS; Härkki P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jul; 94(7):701-707. PubMed ID: 25867490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes.
Igwe E; Hernandez E; Rose S; Uppal S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):484.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24949539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and validation of a laparoscopic hysterectomy cuff closure simulation model for surgical training.
Tunitsky-Bitton E; Propst K; Muffly T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):392.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26640072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Deimling TA; Eldridge JL; Riley KA; Kunselman AR; Harkins GJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jan; 136(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 28099699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a percutaneous surgical system: a pilot study towards scarless surgery.
Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Rotolo S; Cianci S; Panico G; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():132-5. PubMed ID: 27289066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of Surgical Competence: Development and Validation of Rating Scales Used for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy.
Goderstad JM; Sandvik L; Fosse E; Lieng M
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):600-8. PubMed ID: 26966082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Dojki SS; Bano A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Jun; 28(6):427-430. PubMed ID: 29848416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Minimum-Volume Standards on Patient Outcomes and Surgical Practice Patterns for Hysterectomy.
Ruiz MP; Chen L; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 132(5):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 30303921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
Huang CC; Wu MP; Huang YT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22300773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning curves for laparoscopic hysterectomy after implementation of minimally invasive surgery.
Mavrova R; Radosa JC; Wagenpfeil G; Hamza A; Solomayer EF; Juhasz-Böss I
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 134(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 27233815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
