These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27402349)

  • 1. Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care.
    Cheung KL; Wijnen BF; Hollin IL; Janssen EM; Bridges JF; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Dec; 34(12):1195-1209. PubMed ID: 27402349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
    Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
    Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
    Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.
    Vass C; Gray E; Payne K
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):620-30. PubMed ID: 26610687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.
    Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A; Zweifel P; Johnson FR
    Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):2. PubMed ID: 26743636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.
    Webb EJD; Meads D; Lynch Y; Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Meredith S; Moulam L; Hess S; Murray J
    Value Health; 2021 Apr; 24(4):575-584. PubMed ID: 33840436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Krucien N; Watson V; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):e1-e16. PubMed ID: 27917560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.
    Soekhai V; Donkers B; Johansson JV; Jimenez-Moreno C; Pinto CA; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob E
    Patient; 2023 May; 16(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 36781628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study.
    Malhotra R; Suppiah SD; Tan YW; Sung P; Tay SSC; Tan NC; Koh GC; Chan A; Chew LST; Ozdemir S;
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2023 Nov; 19(11):1455-1464. PubMed ID: 37507340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.
    Schatz NK; Fabiano GA; Cunningham CE; dosReis S; Waschbusch DA; Jerome S; Lupas K; Morris KL
    Patient; 2015 Dec; 8(6):483-97. PubMed ID: 25644223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Preference Heterogeneity in Health: A Systematic Review.
    Zhou M; Thayer WM; Bridges JFP
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Feb; 36(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 28975582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review.
    Vass CM; Georgsson S; Ulph F; Payne K
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 30991967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Best-Worst Scaling and the Prioritization of Objects in Health: A Systematic Review.
    Hollin IL; Paskett J; Schuster ALR; Crossnohere NL; Bridges JFP
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Sep; 40(9):883-899. PubMed ID: 35838889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.
    Netten A; Burge P; Malley J; Potoglou D; Towers AM; Brazier J; Flynn T; Forder J; Wall B
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(16):1-166. PubMed ID: 22459668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Valuing Treatments for Parkinson Disease Incorporating Process Utility: Performance of Best-Worst Scaling, Time Trade-Off, and Visual Analogue Scales.
    Weernink MG; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; IJzerman MJ; van Til JA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 27021757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Guide to Measuring and Interpreting Attribute Importance.
    Gonzalez JM
    Patient; 2019 Jun; 12(3):287-295. PubMed ID: 30906968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eliciting patient preferences, priorities and trade-offs for outcomes following kidney transplantation: a pilot best-worst scaling survey.
    Howell M; Wong G; Rose J; Tong A; Craig JC; Howard K
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e008163. PubMed ID: 26810994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery.
    van Dijk JD; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Marshall DA; IJzerman MJ
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 27325322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.