114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27402405)
21. Decompression and nonfusion dynamic stabilization for spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Clinical article.
Lee SE; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 25084033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Neurogenic intermittent claudication in lumbar spinal canal stenosis: the clinical relationship between the local pressure of the intervertebral foramen and the clinical findings in lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Morishita Y; Hida S; Naito M; Arimizu J; Takamori Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 19342935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Modified fenestration with restorative spinoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Matsudaira K; Yamazaki T; Seichi A; Hoshi K; Hara N; Ogiwara S; Terayama S; Chikuda H; Takeshita K; Nakamura K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jun; 10(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 19558293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Determination of the Optimal Cutoff Values for Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire Scores and the Oswestry Disability Index for Favorable Surgical Outcomes in Subjects With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Kim HJ; Park JW; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Kang SS; Yeom JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):E1110-6. PubMed ID: 26076437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cut-off Value for Body Mass Index in Predicting Surgical Success in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Azimi P; Yazdanian T; Shahzadi S; Benzel EC; Azhari S; Nayeb Aghaei H; Montazeri A
Asian Spine J; 2018 Dec; 12(6):1085-1091. PubMed ID: 30322247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach.
Papavero L; Thiel M; Fritzsche E; Kunze C; Westphal M; Kothe R
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):182-7; discussion187. PubMed ID: 19934993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the results of operative management of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Islam MS; Ara R; Salam MA; Rahman MW; Alam MJ; Karim MR; Rahman M; Alam MN; Hussain MF
Mymensingh Med J; 2013 Oct; 22(4):676-83. PubMed ID: 24292296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Distraction of facets with intraarticular spacers as treatment for lumbar canal stenosis: report on a preliminary experience with 21 cases.
Goel A; Shah A; Jadhav M; Nama S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 21923239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation.
Takenaka S; Tateishi K; Hosono N; Mukai Y; Fuji T
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Apr; 24(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 26654340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Analysis of radiological criteria correlation and clinical manifestation of central lumbosacral spinal stenosis].
Shevelev IN; Kornienko VN; Konovalov NA; Cherkashov AM; Nazarenko AG; Asiutin DS
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2012; 76(3):61-8; discussion 68. PubMed ID: 22856125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging measurements for assessing cervical spinal canal stenosis.
Rüegg TB; Wicki AG; Aebli N; Wisianowsky C; Krebs J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 25525959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Degenerative spondylolisthesis in patients with neurogenic claudication effects functional performance and self-reported quality of life.
Drury T; Ames SE; Costi K; Beynnon B; Hall J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2812-7. PubMed ID: 19940740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-term follow-up of revision decompressive lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients.
Shabat S; Arinzon Z; Gepstein R; Folman Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 May; 24(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 21519302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression.
Mekhail N; Costandi S; Abraham B; Samuel SW
Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 22651852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis.
Iwatsuki K; Yoshimine T; Aoki M
Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study.
Gunzburg R; Keller TS; Szpalski M; Vandeputte K; Spratt KF
Eur Spine J; 2003 Apr; 12(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 12709858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
