These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27402744)

  • 1. Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game.
    Balietti S; Goldstone RL; Helbing D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(30):8414-9. PubMed ID: 27402744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Anterior Insula Tracks Behavioral Entropy during an Interpersonal Competitive Game.
    Takahashi H; Izuma K; Matsumoto M; Matsumoto K; Omori T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0123329. PubMed ID: 26039634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competition strength influences individual preferences in an auction game.
    Toelch U; Jubera-Garcia E; Kurth-Nelson Z; Dolan RJ
    Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 25168161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender differences in response to competition with same-gender coworkers: A relational perspective.
    Lee SY; Kesebir S; Pillutla MM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 110(6):869-86. PubMed ID: 27078505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competitive science: is competition ruining science?
    Fang FC; Casadevall A
    Infect Immun; 2015 Apr; 83(4):1229-33. PubMed ID: 25605760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dark side of creativity: biological vulnerability and negative emotions lead to greater artistic creativity.
    Akinola M; Mendes WB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1677-86. PubMed ID: 18832338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
    Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome and view of the player modulate motor area activity during observation of a competitive game.
    Shimada S; Abe R
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):1930-4. PubMed ID: 20230845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures.
    Bianchi F; Grimaldo F; Bravo G; Squazzoni F
    Scientometrics; 2018; 116(3):1401-1420. PubMed ID: 30147203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instructions of cooperation and competition influence the neural responses to others' pain: An ERP study.
    Cui F; Zhu X; Duan F; Luo Y
    Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 26226618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.
    McNutt RA; Evans AT; Fletcher RH; Fletcher SW
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1371-6. PubMed ID: 2304216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of an intensified competition on fatigue and match performance in junior rugby league players.
    Johnston RD; Gabbett TJ; Jenkins DG
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Sep; 16(5):460-5. PubMed ID: 23245879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.
    Azer SA; Ramani S; Peterson R
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 22643022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When are low testosterone levels advantageous? The moderating role of individual versus intergroup competition.
    Mehta PH; Wuehrmann EV; Josephs RA
    Horm Behav; 2009 Jun; 56(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 19362091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cooperation between referees and authors increases peer review accuracy.
    Leek JT; Taub MA; Pineda FJ
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e26895. PubMed ID: 22096506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cheating is evolutionarily assimilated with cooperation in the continuous snowdrift game.
    Sasaki T; Okada I
    Biosystems; 2015 May; 131():51-9. PubMed ID: 25868940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication in context: Interpreting promises in an experiment on competition and trust.
    Casella A; Kartik N; Sanchez L; Turban S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jan; 115(5):933-938. PubMed ID: 29339524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's coping with in vivo peer rejection: an experimental investigation.
    Reijntjes A; Stegge H; Terwogt MM; Kamphuis JH; Telch MJ
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 2006 Dec; 34(6):877-89. PubMed ID: 17111114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.