These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27403049)

  • 21. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Stress Distribution of Mini Dental Implant-Supported Overdentures in Complete Cleft Palate Models: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Soğancı G; Yazıcıoğlu H
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 24919124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of the location and diameter of implants on the stress distribution in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures under dynamic loads].
    Lü J; Liu C; Lan J; Gao X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 24437284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of attachment types and number of implants supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: a computed tomography-based 3D finite element analysis.
    Arat Bilhan S; Baykasoglu C; Bilhan H; Kutay O; Mugan A
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 25443880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
    Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
    Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stress Distribution in Bone and Implants in Mandibular 6-Implant-Supported Cantilevered Fixed Prosthesis: A 3D Finite Element Study.
    Padhye OV; Herekar M; Patil V; Mulani S; Sethi M; Fernandes A
    Implant Dent; 2015 Dec; 24(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 26165389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Tokar E; Uludag B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures.
    dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani RL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24392474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdentures retained with one, two, or four ball attachments: A finite element study.
    El-Zawahry MM; Ibraheem EM; Nassani MZ; Ghorab SA; El-Anwar MI
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2018; 15(6):437-443. PubMed ID: 30534172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of two designs of implant-supported overdentures on peri-implant and posterior mandibular bone resorptions: a 5-year prospective radiographic study.
    Elsyad MA; Alokda MM; Gebreel AA; Hammouda NI; Habib AA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):e184-e192. PubMed ID: 27637737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length.
    Yoo JS; Kwon KR; Noh K; Lee H; Paek J
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 9(3):143-151. PubMed ID: 28680544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
    Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stress distribution of overdenture using odd number implants - A Finite Element Study.
    Kasani R; Rama Sai Attili BK; Dommeti VK; Merdji A; Biswas JK; Roy S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Oct; 98():369-382. PubMed ID: 31326699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of Implant Positions and Occlusal Forces on Peri-Implant Bone Stress in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Martin-Fernandez E; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
    J Oral Implantol; 2017 Dec; 43(6):419-428. PubMed ID: 28972823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Finite element analysis of different loading conditions for implant-supported overdentures supported by conventional or mini implants.
    Solberg K; Heinemann F; Pellikaan P; Keilig L; Stark H; Bourauel C; Hasan I
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(7):770-782. PubMed ID: 28279083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.