These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27403758)

  • 1. One-Year Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Kenton K; Mueller ER; Tarney C; Bresee C; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):382-4. PubMed ID: 27403758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Gurshumov E; Lewis C; Priestley JL; Komar J; Shah N; Salamon CG
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Jun; 25(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 24264283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Chow GK; Elliott DS
    Int J Urol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1155-8. PubMed ID: 26300382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Culligan PJ; Salamon C; Priestley JL; Shariati A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 23262939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mesh Exposure After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Hartog FE; Aalders KIM; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):636-642. PubMed ID: 29964179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go?
    Wong V; Guzman Rojas R; Shek KL; Chou D; Moore KH; Dietz HP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 26877210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Salamon CG; Lewis C; Priestley J; Gurshumov E; Culligan PJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1371-5. PubMed ID: 23296684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair.
    Liu CK; Tsai CP; Chou MM; Shen PS; Chen GD; Hung YC; Hung MJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):552-8. PubMed ID: 25510700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
    Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
    Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.