These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27404336)

  • 1. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying the Source of Misfit in Item Response Theory Models.
    Liu Y; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2014; 49(4):354-71. PubMed ID: 26765803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.
    Cai L; Hansen M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):245-76. PubMed ID: 22642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.
    Hagell P; Westergren A
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):416-431. PubMed ID: 28009589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How should we assess the fit of Rasch-type models? Approximating the power of goodness-of-fit statistics in categorical data analysis.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Montaño R
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jan; 78(1):116-33. PubMed ID: 25107521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The choice of the ability estimate with asymptotically correct standardized person-fit statistics.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):175-93. PubMed ID: 27062601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incremental Model Fit Assessment in the Case of Categorical Data: Tucker-Lewis Index for Item Response Theory Modeling.
    Cai L; Chung SW; Lee T
    Prev Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(3):455-466. PubMed ID: 33970410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the Behaviors of
    Xu J; Paek I; Xia Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Nov; 41(8):632-644. PubMed ID: 29881108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Approximate Fit in Categorical Data Analysis.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Joe H
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2014; 49(4):305-28. PubMed ID: 26765800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Extended GFfit Statistic Defined on Orthogonal Components of Pearson's Chi-Square.
    Reiser M; Cagnone S; Zhu J
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):208-240. PubMed ID: 35661291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new test and graphical tool to assess the goodness of fit of logistic regression models.
    Nattino G; Finazzi S; Bertolini G
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(5):709-20. PubMed ID: 26439593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the Utility of Logistic Mixed Modeling Approaches to Simultaneously Investigate Item and Testlet DIF on Testlet-based Data.
    Fukuhara H; Paek I
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 26784379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SEM of another flavour: two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm.
    Cai L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):309-29. PubMed ID: 17971266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data.
    Reiser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):331-60. PubMed ID: 17535483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.