These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2740439)

  • 21. Calibration coefficients of dosimeters used in mammography for various target/filter combinations.
    Sekimoto M; Katoh Y; Katoh T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):401-410. PubMed ID: 26699570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of automatic kV selection on dose and contrast for a mammographic X-ray system.
    Young KC; Ramsdale ML; Rust A; Cooke J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Oct; 70(838):1036-42. PubMed ID: 9404208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High-rate x-ray spectroscopy in mammography with a CdTe detector: a digital pulse processing approach.
    Abbene L; Gerardi G; Principato F; Del Sordo S; Ienzi R; Raso G
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6147-56. PubMed ID: 21302771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammographic x-ray unit kilovoltage test tool based on k-edge absorption effect.
    Napolitano ME; Trueblood JH; Hertel NE; David G
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2169-76. PubMed ID: 12349939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Investigations on contrast values in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schüle E; Seeger W
    Rofo; 1981 Aug; 135(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 6212315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The measurement and routine checking of mammography x-ray tube kV.
    Law J
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Aug; 36(8):1133-9. PubMed ID: 1924547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of a compression paddle on energy response, calibration and measurement with mammographic dosimeters using ionization chambers and solid-state detectors.
    Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A; Koumbouli E
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1047-59. PubMed ID: 19168939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
    Beaman S; Lillicrap SC; Price JL
    Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An experimental "trans-molybdenum" tube for mammography.
    Johnson GA; O'Foghludha F
    Radiology; 1978 May; 127(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 644079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The determination of total filtration on mammographic X-ray sets.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Apr; 65(772):334-8. PubMed ID: 1581792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammography spectrum measurement using an x-ray diffraction device.
    Boone JM; Yu T; Seibert A
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Sep; 43(9):2569-82. PubMed ID: 9755946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Rothschild P
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microcontrolled pyro-electric instrument for measuring X-ray intensity in mammography.
    de Paula MH; de Carvalho AA; Brassalotti AL; Alter AJ; Sakamoto WK; Malmonge JA; de Almeida A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Nov; 43(6):751-5. PubMed ID: 16594302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
    Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
    Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Necessity of delivering the calibration coefficient of a dosimeter for low energy X-rays used in mammography X-ray units].
    Matsuo C; Tachibana M; Akasaka T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Aug; 64(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 18772533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.