228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27406664)
1. The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.
Brimijoin WO; Akeroyd MA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):588-600. PubMed ID: 27406664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Head Movements on Sound-Source Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Patients With Their Cochlear Implant On Versus Off.
Pastore MT; Natale SJ; Clayton C; Dorman MF; Yost WA; Zhou Y
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1660-1674. PubMed ID: 33136640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head Movements Allow Listeners Bilaterally Implanted With Cochlear Implants to Resolve Front-Back Confusions.
Pastore MT; Natale SJ; Yost WA; Dorman MF
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1224-1231. PubMed ID: 29664750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Left-right and front-back spatial hearing with multiple directional microphone configurations in modern hearing aids.
Carette E; Van den Bogaert T; Laureyns M; Wouters J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):791-803. PubMed ID: 25405835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements.
Coudert A; Gaveau V; Gatel J; Verdelet G; Salemme R; Farne A; Pavani F; Truy E
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):192-205. PubMed ID: 34225320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
Ricketts T
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of head movements and signal spectrum in an auditory front/back illusion.
Brimijoin WO; Akeroyd MA
Iperception; 2012; 3(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 23145279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The moving minimum audible angle is smaller during self motion than during source motion.
Brimijoin WO; Akeroyd MA
Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():273. PubMed ID: 25228856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-motion with Hearing Impairment and (Directional) Hearing Aids.
Hendrikse MME; Eichler T; Hohmann V; Grimm G
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221078707. PubMed ID: 35341403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sound Quality Effects of an Adaptive Nonlinear Frequency Compression Processor with Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Glista D; Hawkins M; Vaisberg JM; Pourmand N; Parsa V; Scollie S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):552-563. PubMed ID: 30395533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Multi-microphone Signal Enhancement Algorithms on the Acoustics and Detectability of Angular and Radial Source Movements.
Lundbeck M; Hartog L; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Bramsløw L; Neher T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518779719. PubMed ID: 29900799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of dynamic-range compression on the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners.
Wiggins IM; Seeber BU
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 22246139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.
Gifford RH; Loiselle L; Natale S; Sheffield SW; Sunderhaus LW; S Dietrich M; Dorman MF
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1306-1321. PubMed ID: 29800361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory externalization in hearing-impaired listeners: the effect of pinna cues and number of talkers.
Boyd AW; Whitmer WM; Soraghan JJ; Akeroyd MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL268-74. PubMed ID: 22423819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An overview of the major phenomena of the localization of sound sources by normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and aided listeners.
Akeroyd MA
Trends Hear; 2014 Dec; 18():. PubMed ID: 25492094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resolving front-back ambiguity with head rotation: The role of level dynamics.
Pöntynen H; Salminen NH
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():196-207. PubMed ID: 30981050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
