BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27406979)

  • 1. Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by multimodality cardiac imaging.
    Bertini M; Mele D; Malagù M; Fiorencis A; Toselli T; Casadei F; Cannizzaro T; Fragale C; Fucili A; Campagnolo E; Benea G; Ferrari R
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1375-1382. PubMed ID: 27406979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodality imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Nørgaard BL; Poulsen SH; Bouchelouche K; Böttcher M; Jensen HK; Jensen JM; Kristensen J; Gerdes C; Mortensen PT; Nielsen JC
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1365-1374. PubMed ID: 27087019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using three-dimensional echocardiography to guide left ventricle lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: does it make any difference.
    Badran HA; Kamel JZ; Mohamed TR; Abdelhamid MA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Apr; 48(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 28194611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
    Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA
    Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrically vs. imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Stephansen C; Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Jensen JM; Nørgaard BL; Gerdes C; Kristensen J; Jensen HK; Fyenbo DB; Bouchelouche K; Nielsen JC
    Europace; 2019 Sep; 21(9):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 31274152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic benefit of optimum left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: follow-up of the TARGET Study Cohort (Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).
    Kydd AC; Khan FZ; Watson WD; Pugh PJ; Virdee MS; Dutka DP
    JACC Heart Fail; 2014 Jun; 2(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 24952685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Khan FZ; Virdee MS; Palmer CR; Pugh PJ; O'Halloran D; Elsik M; Read PA; Begley D; Fynn SP; Dutka DP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 59(17):1509-18. PubMed ID: 22405632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of the right ventricular lead position on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Khan FZ; Salahshouri P; Duehmke R; Read PA; Pugh PJ; Elsik M; Begley D; Fynn SP; Dutka DP; Virdee MS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 Apr; 34(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 21208234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left Ventricular Lead Position Guided by Parametric Strain Echocardiography Improves Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Mele D; Nardozza M; Malagù M; Leonetti E; Fragale C; Rondinella A; Ferrari R; Bertini M
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1001-1011. PubMed ID: 28822669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac resynchronization therapy when no lateral pacing option exists: vectorcardiographic guided non-lateral left ventricular lead placement predicts acute hemodynamic response.
    Ross S; Odland HH; Aranda A; Edvardsen T; Gammelsrud LO; Haland TF; Cornelussen R; Hopp E; Kongsgaard E
    Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 29036446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sites of left and right ventricular lead implantation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy observations from the REVERSE trial.
    Thébault C; Donal E; Meunier C; Gervais R; Gerritse B; Gold MR; Abraham WT; Linde C; Daubert JC;
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Nov; 33(21):2662-71. PubMed ID: 22285578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular pacing lead position and cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived wall motion patterns: a prospective cohort study.
    Hartlage GR; Suever JD; Clement-Guinaudeau S; Strickland PT; Ghasemzadeh N; Magrath RP; Parikh A; Lerakis S; Hoskins MH; Leon AR; Lloyd MS; Oshinski JN
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Jul; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 26170046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived anatomy, scar, and dyssynchrony fused with fluoroscopy to guide LV lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison with acute haemodynamic measures and echocardiographic reverse remodelling.
    Shetty AK; Duckett SG; Ginks MR; Ma Y; Sohal M; Bostock J; Kapetanakis S; Singh JP; Rhode K; Wright M; O'Neill MD; Gill JS; Carr-White G; Razavi R; Rinaldi CA
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jul; 14(7):692-9. PubMed ID: 23175695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left ventricular lead position, mechanical activation, and myocardial scar in relation to left ventricular reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A feature-tracking and contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Taylor RJ; Umar F; Panting JR; Stegemann B; Leyva F
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Feb; 13(2):481-9. PubMed ID: 26498258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dependency of cardiac resynchronization therapy on myocardial viability at the LV lead position.
    Becker M; Zwicker C; Kaminski M; Napp A; Altiok E; Ocklenburg C; Friedman Z; Adam D; Schauerte P; Marx N; Hoffmann R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Apr; 4(4):366-74. PubMed ID: 21492811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Pappone C; Ćalović Ž; Vicedomini G; Cuko A; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Romano E; Baldi M; Saviano M; Pappone A; Ciaccio C; Giannelli L; Ionescu B; Petretta A; Vitale R; Fundaliotis A; Tavazzi L; Santinelli V
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25109276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multimodality imaging for real-time image-guided left ventricular lead placement during cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations.
    Salden OAE; van den Broek HT; van Everdingen WM; Mohamed Hoesein FAA; Velthuis BK; Doevendans PA; Cramer MJ; Tuinenburg AE; Leufkens P; van Slochteren FJ; Meine M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 30847659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between radial strain evaluation by speckle-tracking echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, for assessment of suitable segments for left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bakos Z; Ostenfeld E; Markstad H; Werther-Evaldsson A; Roijer A; Arheden H; Carlsson M; Borgquist R
    Europace; 2014 Dec; 16(12):1779-86. PubMed ID: 25031235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left ventricular resynchronization is mandatory for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis in patients with echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony at baseline.
    Bleeker GB; Mollema SA; Holman ER; Van de Veire N; Ypenburg C; Boersma E; van der Wall EE; Schalij MJ; Bax JJ
    Circulation; 2007 Sep; 116(13):1440-8. PubMed ID: 17785624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An anterior left ventricular lead position is associated with increased mortality and non-response in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Kronborg MB; Johansen JB; Riahi S; Petersen HH; Haarbo J; Jørgensen OD; Nielsen JC
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 222():157-162. PubMed ID: 27494729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.