These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2740908)

  • 1. Ethics in science. NIH grapples with conflict of interest.
    Palca J
    Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4913):23. PubMed ID: 2740908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current NIH perspectives on misconduct in science.
    Miers ML
    Am Psychol; 1985 Jul; 40(7):831-5. PubMed ID: 4037514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH conflict-of-interest guidelines shot down.
    Palca J
    Science; 1990 Jan; 247(4939):154-5. PubMed ID: 2294600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research ethics: no conflict-of-interest rules.
    Anderson GC
    Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6254):104. PubMed ID: 2296296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conflict of interest eyed at Harvard.
    Booth W
    Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4885):1497-9. PubMed ID: 3201233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH finds fraud in cell paper.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(5001):1552-4. PubMed ID: 2011731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The federal role in influencing research ethics education and standards in science.
    Dustira AK
    Prof Ethics; 1996; 5(1-2):139-56. PubMed ID: 11813726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
    Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
    Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical values in the education of biomedical researchers.
    Heitman E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(4 Suppl):S40-4. PubMed ID: 11658244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Teaching scientific integrity.
    Gifford F
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct. A final frenzy for landmark cases?
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6355):6-7. PubMed ID: 1731200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH scientists agonize over technology transfer.
    Booth W
    Science; 1989 Jan; 243(4887):20-1. PubMed ID: 2911715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH guidance is rejected.
    McGourty C
    Nature; 1989 Jul; 340(6228):7. PubMed ID: 2739726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH panel finds no fraud in Cell paper but cites errors.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4885):1499. PubMed ID: 3201234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict-of-interest debate stirs mixed reaction at NIH.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1994 Feb; 367(6462):401. PubMed ID: 8107786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NIH developing policy on misconduct.
    Sun M
    Science; 1982 May; 216(4547):711-2. PubMed ID: 7079729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH grapples with misconduct.
    Broad WJ
    Science; 1982 Jul; 217(4556):227. PubMed ID: 7089558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The curious saga of Congress, the NIH, and conflict of interest.
    Crigger BJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 15957312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testimony before the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel.
    Irving DN
    Linacre Q; 1994 Nov; 61(4):82-9. PubMed ID: 11652834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advisory committee urges changes at OSI.
    Gibbons A
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5036):1287-8. PubMed ID: 1962186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.