These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27409250)

  • 1. Influence of Stream Bottom Substrate on Retention and Transport of Vertebrate Environmental DNA.
    Jerde CL; Olds BP; Shogren AJ; Andruszkiewicz EA; Mahon AR; Bolster D; Tank JL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Aug; 50(16):8770-9. PubMed ID: 27409250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Controls on eDNA movement in streams: Transport, Retention, and Resuspension.
    Shogren AJ; Tank JL; Andruszkiewicz E; Olds B; Mahon AR; Jerde CL; Bolster D
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5065. PubMed ID: 28698557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling the transport of environmental DNA through a porous substrate using continuous flow-through column experiments.
    Shogren AJ; Tank JL; Andruszkiewicz EA; Olds B; Jerde C; Bolster D
    J R Soc Interface; 2016 Jun; 13(119):. PubMed ID: 27251680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliable eDNA detection and quantification of the European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis).
    Brys R; Halfmaerten D; Neyrinck S; Mauvisseau Q; Auwerx J; Sweet M; Mergeay J
    J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb; 98(2):399-414. PubMed ID: 32154579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of droplet digital PCR for estimation of fish abundance and biomass in environmental DNA surveys.
    Doi H; Uchii K; Takahara T; Matsuhashi S; Yamanaka H; Minamoto T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122763. PubMed ID: 25799582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) outperforms real-time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species.
    Doi H; Takahara T; Minamoto T; Matsuhashi S; Uchii K; Yamanaka H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5601-8. PubMed ID: 25850372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river.
    Deiner K; Altermatt F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88786. PubMed ID: 24523940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long distance (>20 km) downstream detection of endangered stream frogs suggests an important role for eDNA in surveying for remnant amphibian populations.
    Villacorta-Rath C; Hoskin CJ; Strugnell JM; Burrows D
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12013. PubMed ID: 34692243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distance, flow and PCR inhibition: eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams.
    Jane SF; Wilcox TM; McKelvey KS; Young MK; Schwartz MK; Lowe WH; Letcher BH; Whiteley AR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jan; 15(1):216-27. PubMed ID: 24890199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No evidence that crayfish carcasses produce detectable environmental DNA (eDNA) in a stream enclosure experiment.
    Curtis AN; Larson ER
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9333. PubMed ID: 32566410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of environmental DNA to detect and quantify stream tadpoles of
    Iwai N; Yasumiba K; Takahara T
    R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Jan; 6(1):181798. PubMed ID: 30800406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream-dwelling amphibian.
    Pilliod DS; Goldberg CS; Arkle RS; Waits LP
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Jan; 14(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 24034561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stream Transport and Retention of Environmental DNA Pulse Releases in Relation to Hydrogeomorphic Scaling Factors.
    Fremier AK; Strickler KM; Parzych J; Powers S; Goldberg CS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jun; 53(12):6640-6649. PubMed ID: 31117529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Residual eDNA detection sensitivity assessed by quantitative real-time PCR in a river ecosystem.
    Balasingham KD; Walter RP; Heath DD
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 May; 17(3):523-532. PubMed ID: 27617668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying environmental DNA signals for aquatic invasive species across multiple detection platforms.
    Nathan LM; Simmons M; Wegleitner BJ; Jerde CL; Mahon AR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(21):12800-6. PubMed ID: 25299381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Water Flow and Biofilm Cover Influence Environmental DNA Detection in Recirculating Streams.
    Shogren AJ; Tank JL; Egan SP; August O; Rosi EJ; Hanrahan BR; Renshaw MA; Gantz CA; Bolster D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Aug; 52(15):8530-8537. PubMed ID: 29995389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can environmental DNA (eDNA) be used for detection and monitoring of introduced crab species in the Baltic Sea?
    Forsström T; Vasemägi A
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2016 Aug; 109(1):350-355. PubMed ID: 27261280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acidity promotes degradation of multi-species environmental DNA in lotic mesocosms.
    Seymour M; Durance I; Cosby BJ; Ransom-Jones E; Deiner K; Ormerod SJ; Colbourne JK; Wilgar G; Carvalho GR; de Bruyn M; Edwards F; Emmett BA; Bik HM; Creer S
    Commun Biol; 2018; 1():4. PubMed ID: 30271891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA.
    Port JA; O'Donnell JL; Romero-Maraccini OC; Leary PR; Litvin SY; Nickols KJ; Yamahara KM; Kelly RP
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(2):527-41. PubMed ID: 26586544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection limits of quantitative and digital PCR assays and their influence in presence-absence surveys of environmental DNA.
    Hunter ME; Dorazio RM; Butterfield JS; Meigs-Friend G; Nico LG; Ferrante JA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):221-229. PubMed ID: 27768244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.