These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27409279)

  • 1. The effect of individual differences in working memory in older adults on performance with different degrees of automated technology.
    Pak R; McLaughlin AC; Leidheiser W; Rovira E
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):518-532. PubMed ID: 27409279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.
    McKendrick R; Shaw T; de Visser E; Saqer H; Kidwell B; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):463-75. PubMed ID: 24930169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.
    Wright JL; Chen JYC; Barnes MJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29451105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults.
    Pak R; Fink N; Price M; Bass B; Sturre L
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1059-72. PubMed ID: 22799560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age differences in proactive interference, working memory, and abstract reasoning.
    Emery L; Hale S; Myerson J
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Sep; 23(3):634-45. PubMed ID: 18808252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the effect of workload on automation use for younger and older adults.
    McBride SE; Rogers WA; Fisk AD
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):672-86. PubMed ID: 22235529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reaction Times to Consecutive Automation Failures: A Function of Working Memory and Sustained Attention.
    Jipp M
    Hum Factors; 2016 Dec; 58(8):1248-1261. PubMed ID: 27507167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory affects older adults' use of context in spoken-word recognition.
    Janse E; Jesse A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1842-62. PubMed ID: 24443921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM; Ilgen DR
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 18516832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience of automation failures in training: effects on trust, automation bias, complacency and performance.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A; Wastell D
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):767-80. PubMed ID: 26374396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical modelling of networked human-automation performance using working memory capacity.
    Ahmed N; de Visser E; Shaw T; Mohamed-Ameen A; Campbell M; Parasuraman R
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(3):295-318. PubMed ID: 24308716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Modeling and Simulation to Predict Operator Performance and Automation-Induced Complacency With Robotic Automation: A Case Study and Empirical Validation.
    Wickens CD; Sebok A; Li H; Sarter N; Gacy AM
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):959-75. PubMed ID: 25850111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age and automation interact to influence performance of a simulated luggage screening task.
    Wiegmann D; McCarley JS; Kramer AF; Wickens CD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Aug; 77(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 16909876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker.
    McFadden SM; Vimalachandran A; Blackmore E
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 14668161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Entity versus incremental theories predict older adults' memory performance.
    Plaks JE; Chasteen AL
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):948-57. PubMed ID: 24128076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Cognitive Load and Task Complexity on Automation Bias in Electronic Prescribing.
    Lyell D; Magrabi F; Coiera E
    Hum Factors; 2018 Nov; 60(7):1008-1021. PubMed ID: 29939764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration.
    Parasuraman R; Manzey DH
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):381-410. PubMed ID: 21077562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complacency and Automation Bias in the Use of Imperfect Automation.
    Wickens CD; Clegg BA; Vieane AZ; Sebok AL
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):728-39. PubMed ID: 25886768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.