These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27410105)

  • 1. Dynamic lens and monovision 3D displays to improve viewer comfort.
    Johnson PV; Parnell JA; Kim J; Saunter CD; Love GD; Banks MS
    Opt Express; 2016 May; 24(11):11808-27. PubMed ID: 27410105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The rate of change of vergence-accommodation conflict affects visual discomfort.
    Kim J; Kane D; Banks MS
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():159-65. PubMed ID: 25448713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. True three-dimensional displays that allow viewers to dynamically shift accommodation, bringing objects displayed at different viewing distances into and out of focus.
    Schowengerdt BT; Seibel EJ
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Dec; 7(6):610-20. PubMed ID: 15687795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Depth-of-Focus Affects 3D Perception in Stereoscopic Displays.
    Vienne C; Blondé L; Mamassian P
    Perception; 2015; 44(6):613-27. PubMed ID: 26489206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancement of Visual Comfort and Sense of Presence on Stereoscopic 3D Images.
    Oh H; Kim J; Kim J; Kim T; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Aug; 26(8):3789-3801. PubMed ID: 28499997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoscopic 3D Visual Discomfort Prediction: A Dynamic Accommodation and Vergence Interaction Model.
    Oh H; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Feb; 25(2):615-29. PubMed ID: 26672036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual Discomfort with Stereo 3D Displays when the Head is Not Upright.
    Kane D; Held RT; Banks MS
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2012 Feb; 8288():828814. PubMed ID: 24058723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the accommodation-vergence conflict on vergence eye movements.
    Vienne C; Sorin L; Blondé L; Huynh-Thu Q; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():124-33. PubMed ID: 24835799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.
    Hoffman DM; Girshick AR; Akeley K; Banks MS
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):33.1-30. PubMed ID: 18484839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optical mapping near-eye three-dimensional display with correct focus cues.
    Cui W; Gao L
    Opt Lett; 2017 Jul; 42(13):2475-2478. PubMed ID: 28957270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D visual discomfort predictor: analysis of horizontal disparity and neural activity statistics.
    Park J; Oh H; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Mar; 24(3):1101-14. PubMed ID: 25532185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual Discomfort and the Temporal Properties of the Vergence-Accommodation Conflict.
    Kim J; Kane D; Banks MS
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2012 Feb; 8288():828811. PubMed ID: 24027615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual fatigue while watching 3D stimuli from different positions.
    Aznar-Casanova JA; Romeo A; Gómez AT; Enrile PM
    J Optom; 2017; 10(3):149-160. PubMed ID: 27544414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accommodation to multiple-focal-plane displays: Implications for improving stereoscopic displays and for accommodation control.
    MacKenzie KJ; Hoffman DM; Watt SJ
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):22. PubMed ID: 20884597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnification and accommodation with phakic intraocular lenses.
    Langenbucher A; Szentmáry N; Seitz B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17470243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereoscopic 3D geometric distortions analyzed from the viewer's point of view.
    Gao Z; Zhai G; Yang X
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240661. PubMed ID: 33057363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binocular accommodative response with extended depth of focus under controlled convergences.
    Lyu J; Ng CJ; Bang SP; Yoon G
    J Vis; 2021 Aug; 21(8):21. PubMed ID: 34415998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth.
    Chandna A; Badler J; Singh D; Watamaniuk S; Heinen S
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10983. PubMed ID: 34040063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays.
    Shibata T; Kim J; Hoffman DM; Banks MS
    J Vis; 2011 Jul; 11(8):11. PubMed ID: 21778252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fixation disparity: binocular vergence accuracy for a visual display at different positions relative to the eyes.
    Jainta S; Jaschinski W
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 12502161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.