These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27411306)

  • 1. Identification of phenotype-relevant differentially expressed genes in breast cancer demonstrates enhanced quantile discretization protocol's utility in multi-platform microarray data integration.
    Mapiye DS; Christoffels AG; Gamieldien J
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2016 Oct; 14(5):1650022. PubMed ID: 27411306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of RNA-Seq data with heterogeneous microarray data for breast cancer profiling.
    Castillo D; Gálvez JM; Herrera LJ; Román BS; Rojas F; Rojas I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):506. PubMed ID: 29157215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-platform analysis of cancer microarray data improves gene expression based classification of phenotypes.
    Warnat P; Eils R; Brors B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():265. PubMed ID: 16271137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of differential gene detection across multiple microarray studies.
    Vo TM; Phan JH; Huynh KN; Wang MD
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4231-4. PubMed ID: 18002936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of differentially expressed genes by meta-analysis of microarray data on breast cancer.
    Kondrakhin YV; Sharipov RN; Keld AE; Kolpakov FA
    In Silico Biol; 2008; 8(5-6):383-411. PubMed ID: 19374127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise filtering and nonparametric analysis of microarray data underscores discriminating markers of oral, prostate, lung, ovarian and breast cancer.
    Aris VM; Cody MJ; Cheng J; Dermody JJ; Soteropoulos P; Recce M; Tolias PP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 5():185. PubMed ID: 15569388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microarrays--identifying molecular portraits for prostate tumors with different Gleason patterns.
    Mendes A; Scott RJ; Moscato P
    Methods Mol Med; 2008; 141():131-51. PubMed ID: 18453088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Bosotti R; Locatelli G; Healy S; Scacheri E; Sartori L; Mercurio C; Calogero R; Isacchi A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. PubMed ID: 17430572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mining published lists of cancer related microarray experiments: identification of a gene expression signature having a critical role in cell-cycle control.
    Finocchiaro G; Mancuso F; Muller H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S14. PubMed ID: 16351740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using co-inertia analysis.
    Culhane AC; Perrière G; Higgins DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 4():59. PubMed ID: 14633289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiclass classification for skin cancer profiling based on the integration of heterogeneous gene expression series.
    Gálvez JM; Castillo D; Herrera LJ; San Román B; Valenzuela O; Ortuño FM; Rojas I
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196836. PubMed ID: 29750795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying differentially expressed genes in cancer patients using a non-parameter Ising model.
    Li X; Feltus FA; Sun X; Wang JZ; Luo F
    Proteomics; 2011 Oct; 11(19):3845-52. PubMed ID: 21761563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In silico identification of breast cancer genes by combined multiple high throughput analyses.
    Shen D; He J; Chang HR
    Int J Mol Med; 2005 Feb; 15(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 15647832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene-set activity toolbox (GAT): A platform for microarray-based cancer diagnosis using an integrative gene-set analysis approach.
    Engchuan W; Meechai A; Tongsima S; Doungpan N; Chan JH
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2016 Aug; 14(4):1650015. PubMed ID: 27102089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust microarray meta-analysis identifies differentially expressed genes for clinical prediction.
    Phan JH; Young AN; Wang MD
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():989637. PubMed ID: 23365541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FGMD: A novel approach for functional gene module detection in cancer.
    Jin D; Lee H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188900. PubMed ID: 29244808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large scale data mining approach for gene-specific standardization of microarray gene expression data.
    Yoon S; Yang Y; Choi J; Seong J
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2898-904. PubMed ID: 17032674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of differentially expressed genes in multiple microarray experiments using discrete fourier transform.
    Choo KW; Kong W
    Front Biosci; 2007 Jan; 12():1845-51. PubMed ID: 17127425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A New Combinatorial Optimization Approach for Integrated Feature Selection Using Different Datasets: A Prostate Cancer Transcriptomic Study.
    Puthiyedth N; Riveros C; Berretta R; Moscato P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127702. PubMed ID: 26106884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Wei C; Li J; Bumgarner RE
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Nov; 5():87. PubMed ID: 15533245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.