208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27412124)
1. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic tumors.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):398-409. PubMed ID: 27412124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer: Short-Term Oncologic Outcomes in 1,733 Patients.
Adam MA; Choudhury K; Goffredo P; Reed SD; Blazer D; Roman SA; Sosa JA
World J Surg; 2015 Oct; 39(10):2564-72. PubMed ID: 26154576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive surgical approaches offer earlier time to adjuvant chemotherapy but not improved survival in resected pancreatic cancer.
Mirkin KA; Greenleaf EK; Hollenbeak CS; Wong J
Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2387-2396. PubMed ID: 29101568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015.
Xia L; Talwar R; Taylor BL; Shin MH; Berger IB; Sperling CD; Chelluri RR; Zambrano IA; Raman JD; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):182.e17-182.e27. PubMed ID: 30630732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and the cost of conversion.
Stewart CL; Wong P; Selby L; Warner SG; Raoof M; Singh G; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
J Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 121(4):670-675. PubMed ID: 31967336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: is the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula comparable to that after open pancreatoduodenectomy?
Kantor O; Pitt HA; Talamonti MS; Roggin KK; Bentrem DJ; Prinz RA; Baker MS
Surgery; 2018 Mar; 163(3):587-593. PubMed ID: 29454444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive vs Open Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Multi-Institutional 10-Year Experience of 1,023 Patients.
Zheng J; Pulvirenti A; Javed AA; Michelakos T; Paniccia A; Lee KK; Ferrone CR; Wei AC; He J; Zureikat AH;
J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Aug; 235(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 35839409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer: Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients.
Adam MA; Choudhury K; Dinan MA; Reed SD; Scheri RP; Blazer DG; Roman SA; Sosa JA
Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):372-7. PubMed ID: 26158612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Barriers to laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: a national analysis.
Hawkins AT; Ford MM; Benjamin Hopkins M; Muldoon RL; Wanderer JP; Parikh AA; Geiger TM
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 28840352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatectomy for Right-Sided and Left-Sided G1/G2 Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multicenter Matched Analysis with an Inverse Probability of Treatment-Weighting Method.
Hwang HK; Song KB; Park M; Kwon W; Jang JY; Heo JS; Choi DW; Kang CM; Park JS; Hong TH; Cho CK; Ahn KS; Lee H; Lee SE; Jeong CY; Roh YH; Kim HJ; Hwang DW; Kim SC; Han HS; Yoon YS;
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7742-7758. PubMed ID: 33969463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience.
Greenleaf EK; Sun SX; Hollenbeak CS; Wong J
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Mar; 20(2):368-378. PubMed ID: 26961133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique.
Daouadi M; Zureikat AH; Zenati MS; Choudry H; Tsung A; Bartlett DL; Hughes SJ; Lee KK; Moser AJ; Zeh HJ
Ann Surg; 2013 Jan; 257(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 22868357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patterns of Use and Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Malignant Pheochromocytoma: A Population-Level Study.
Goffredo P; Adam MA; Thomas SM; Scheri RP; Sosa JA; Roman SA
World J Surg; 2015 Aug; 39(8):1966-73. PubMed ID: 25821949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
