100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27412138)
1. Rydel-Seiffer fork revisited: Beyond a simple case of black and white.
Panosyan FB; Mountain JM; Reilly MM; Shy ME; Herrmann DN
Neurology; 2016 Aug; 87(7):738-40. PubMed ID: 27412138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Test-retest and time dependent variation and diagnostic values of vibratory sensation determined by biothesiometer and the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork.
Wittenberg B; Svendsen TK; Gaist LM; Itani M; Gylfadottir SS; Jensen TS; Gaist D; Sindrup SH; Krøigård T
Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2230. PubMed ID: 34087955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The conventional tuning fork as a quantitative tool for vibration threshold.
Alanazy MH; Alfurayh NA; Almweisheer SN; Aljafen BN; Muayqil T
Muscle Nerve; 2018 Jan; 57(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 28466970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the Rydel-Seiffer graduated tuning fork in the assessment of vibration threshold in postherpetic neuralgia patients and healthy controls.
Whitton TL; Johnson RW; Lovell AT
Eur J Pain; 2005 Apr; 9(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 15737809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The tuning fork revisited.
Liniger C; Albeanu A; Bloise D; Assal JP
Diabet Med; 1990 Dec; 7(10):859-64. PubMed ID: 2149682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vibratory testing with the 64 Hz Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork and its relation to the sural nerve action potential.
Xirou S; Kokotis P; Zambelis T; Anagnostou E
J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2020 Dec; 25(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 33107143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude.
Pestronk A; Florence J; Levine T; Al-Lozi MT; Lopate G; Miller T; Ramneantu I; Waheed W; Stambuk M
Neurology; 2004 Feb; 62(3):461-4. PubMed ID: 14872031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The tuning fork and the at-risk foot.
Hitman GA
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477. PubMed ID: 23151034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI). A comparison with tests using the vibratory and thermal perception thresholds.
Bax G; Fagherazzi C; Piarulli F; Nicolucci A; Fedele D
Diabetes Care; 1996 Aug; 19(8):904-5. PubMed ID: 8842620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and responsiveness of a graduated tuning fork in immune mediated polyneuropathies. The Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Group.
Merkies IS; Schmitz PI; van der Meché FG; van Doorn PA
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 May; 68(5):669-71. PubMed ID: 10766905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposal of a new method for the use of the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork in the screening of diabetic polyneuropathy. A pilot study.
de Simone R; Rabitti PG; De Feo EM; Manguso F; Piscopo G; Scionti L
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2015 May; 108(2):e21-4. PubMed ID: 25773377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vibration testing: Optimizing methods to improve reliability.
Marcuzzi A; Wainwright AC; Costa DSJ; Wrigley PJ
Muscle Nerve; 2019 Feb; 59(2):229-235. PubMed ID: 30390398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An alternative to a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork? Two new, simple, easy-to-use screening tests for determining foot ulcer risk in people with diabetes.
Baker N
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477-9. PubMed ID: 22686252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. European Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group.
Martina IS; van Koningsveld R; Schmitz PI; van der Meché FG; van Doorn PA
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Nov; 65(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 9810949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of vibration sense testing for use in developing countries: comparison of extinction time on the tuning fork to vibration thresholds on the Vibratron II.
London L; Thompson ML; Capper W; Myers JE
Neurotoxicology; 2000 Oct; 21(5):743-52. PubMed ID: 11130278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An assessment of vibration threshold using a biothesiometer compared to a C128-Hz tuning fork.
Temlett JA
J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1435-8. PubMed ID: 19695882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of a new device in the assessment of peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetes.
Bracewell N; Game F; Jeffcoate W; Scammell BE
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1553-5. PubMed ID: 22672257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Rydel Seiffer tuning fork - Age and gender matter.
Wolf K; Beume LA; Hohenhaus M; Harloff A
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Oct; 221():107385. PubMed ID: 35926295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Origins of the sensory examination in neurology.
Freeman C; Okun MS
Semin Neurol; 2002 Dec; 22(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 12539061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Progress in vibrotactile threshold evaluation techniques: a review.
Gandhi MS; Sesek R; Tuckett R; Bamberg SJ
J Hand Ther; 2011; 24(3):240-55; quiz 256. PubMed ID: 21439781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
