These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27412720)

  • 1. Proteomics of hydrophobic samples: Fast, robust and low-cost workflows for clinical approaches.
    Pasing Y; Colnoe S; Hansen T
    Proteomics; 2017 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 27412720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Straightforward Protocol for Gel-Free Proteomic Analysis of Adipose Tissue.
    Pasing Y; Schniers A; Hansen T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1788():289-296. PubMed ID: 28980277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of detergent-based sample preparation workflows for LTQ-Orbitrap analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome.
    Tanca A; Biosa G; Pagnozzi D; Addis MF; Uzzau S
    Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2597-607. PubMed ID: 23784971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plasma proteome coverage is increased by unique peptide recovery from sodium deoxycholate precipitate.
    Serra A; Zhu H; Gallart-Palau X; Park JE; Ho HH; Tam JP; Sze SK
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2016 Mar; 408(7):1963-73. PubMed ID: 26804737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) method increases peptide and protein identifications for shotgun proteomics.
    Ni MW; Wang L; Chen W; Mou HZ; Zhou J; Zheng ZG
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2017 Jan; 31(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 27794190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving Proteome Coverage and Sample Recovery with Enhanced FASP (eFASP) for Quantitative Proteomic Experiments.
    Erde J; Loo RR; Loo JA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1550():11-18. PubMed ID: 28188519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the combinative application of SDS and sodium deoxycholate to the LC-MS-based shotgun analysis of membrane proteomes.
    Lin Y; Wang K; Yan Y; Lin H; Peng B; Liu Z
    J Sep Sci; 2013 Sep; 36(18):3026-34. PubMed ID: 23832743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement of a sample preparation method assisted by sodium deoxycholate for mass-spectrometry-based shotgun membrane proteomics.
    Lin Y; Lin H; Liu Z; Wang K; Yan Y
    J Sep Sci; 2014 Nov; 37(22):3321-9. PubMed ID: 25196059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of FASP, SP3, and iST Protocols for Proteomic Sample Preparation in the Low Microgram Range.
    Sielaff M; Kuharev J; Bohn T; Hahlbrock J; Bopp T; Tenzer S; Distler U
    J Proteome Res; 2017 Nov; 16(11):4060-4072. PubMed ID: 28948796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Small Molecular Additives and Their Effects on Peptide/Protein Identification.
    Gao J; Zhong S; Zhou Y; He H; Peng S; Zhu Z; Liu X; Zheng J; Xu B; Zhou H
    Anal Chem; 2017 Jun; 89(11):5784-5792. PubMed ID: 28530406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Label-Free Quantitative Analysis of Mitochondrial Proteomes Using the Multienzyme Digestion-Filter Aided Sample Preparation (MED-FASP) and "Total Protein Approach".
    Wiśniewski JR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1567():69-77. PubMed ID: 28276014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust assessment of sample preparation protocols for proteomics of cells and tissues.
    Gomes FA; Souza Junior DR; Massafera MP; Ronsein GE
    Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom; 2024 Jun; 1872(5):141030. PubMed ID: 38944097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity of mass spectrometry analysis depends on the shape of the filtration unit used for filter aided sample preparation (FASP).
    Lipecka J; Chhuon C; Bourderioux M; Bessard MA; van Endert P; Edelman A; Guerrera IC
    Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 16(13):1852-7. PubMed ID: 27219663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comprehensive comparison of sample preparation workflows for proteomics.
    Zheng W; Yang P; Sun C; Zhang Y
    Mol Omics; 2022 Jul; 18(6):555-567. PubMed ID: 35671090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filter-Aided Sample Preparation for Proteome Analysis.
    Wiśniewski JR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1841():3-10. PubMed ID: 30259475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments.
    Hughes CS; Moggridge S; Müller T; Sorensen PH; Morin GB; Krijgsveld J
    Nat Protoc; 2019 Jan; 14(1):68-85. PubMed ID: 30464214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Filter-Aided Sample Preparation: The Versatile and Efficient Method for Proteomic Analysis.
    Wiśniewski JR
    Methods Enzymol; 2017; 585():15-27. PubMed ID: 28109427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced FASP (eFASP) to increase proteome coverage and sample recovery for quantitative proteomic experiments.
    Erde J; Loo RR; Loo JA
    J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):1885-95. PubMed ID: 24552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Different Sample Preparation Protocols Reveals Lysis Buffer-Specific Extraction Biases in Gram-Negative Bacteria and Human Cells.
    Glatter T; Ahrné E; Schmidt A
    J Proteome Res; 2015 Nov; 14(11):4472-85. PubMed ID: 26412744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A sample preparation workflow for adipose tissue shotgun proteomics and proteogenomics.
    Khudyakov JI; Deyarmin JS; Hekman RM; Pujade Busqueta L; Maan R; Mody MJ; Banerjee R; Crocker DE; Champagne CD
    Biol Open; 2018 Nov; 7(11):. PubMed ID: 30361411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.