139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27413112)
1. New Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models Improve Predictability of Ames Mutagenicity for Aromatic Azo Compounds.
Manganelli S; Benfenati E; Manganaro A; Kulkarni S; Barton-Maclaren TS; Honma M
Toxicol Sci; 2016 Oct; 153(2):316-26. PubMed ID: 27413112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity.
Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LH; Kier LB; Oloff S; Tropsha A; Xie Q; Tong W
Mutagenesis; 2004 Sep; 19(5):365-77. PubMed ID: 15388809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A knowledge-based expert rule system for predicting mutagenicity (Ames test) of aromatic amines and azo compounds.
Gadaleta D; Manganelli S; Manganaro A; Porta N; Benfenati E
Toxicology; 2016 Aug; 370():20-30. PubMed ID: 27644887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of aromatic amines mutagenicity from theoretical molecular descriptors.
Gramatica P; Consonni V; Pavan M
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):237-50. PubMed ID: 14506868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of (Q)SAR models for predicting Ames mutagenicity of aryl azo and benzidine based compounds.
Kulkarni SA; Barton-Maclaren TS
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2014; 32(1):46-82. PubMed ID: 24598040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction on the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds using quantum chemistry descriptors based QSAR and machine learning derived classification methods.
Hao Y; Sun G; Fan T; Sun X; Liu Y; Zhang N; Zhao L; Zhong R; Peng Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Dec; 186():109822. PubMed ID: 31634658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In silico prediction of the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds using a novel two-QSAR approach.
Ding YL; Lyu YC; Leong MK
Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Apr; 40():102-114. PubMed ID: 28027902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating computational methods to predict mutagenicity of aromatic azo compounds.
Gadaleta D; Porta N; Vrontaki E; Manganelli S; Manganaro A; Sello G; Honma M; Benfenati E
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2017 Oct; 35(4):239-257. PubMed ID: 29027864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.
Honma M; Kitazawa A; Cayley A; Williams RV; Barber C; Hanser T; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Myatt GJ; Cross KP; Benfenati E; Raitano G; Mekenyan O; Petkov P; Bossa C; Benigni R; Battistelli CL; Giuliani A; Tcheremenskaia O; DeMeo C; Norinder U; Koga H; Jose C; Jeliazkova N; Kochev N; Paskaleva V; Yang C; Daga PR; Clark RD; Rathman J
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 30357358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of mutagenicity utilizing a hierarchical QSAR approach.
Basak SC; Mills D
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2001; 12(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 11813801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A large comparison of integrated SAR/QSAR models of the Ames test for mutagenicity
Benfenati E; Golbamaki A; Raitano G; Roncaglioni A; Manganelli S; Lemke F; Norinder U; Lo Piparo E; Honma M; Manganaro A; Gini G
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):591-611. PubMed ID: 30052064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species.
Feeney SV; Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 37477941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines from structure: a hierarchical QSAR approach.
Basak SC; Mills DR; Balaban AT; Gute BD
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 11410045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The enhancement scheme for the predictive ability of QSAR: A case of mutagenicity.
Toropova AP; Toropov AA; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
Toxicol In Vitro; 2023 Sep; 91():105629. PubMed ID: 37307858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative mutagenicity studies of azo dyes and their reduction products in Salmonella typhimurium.
Krishna G; Xu J; Nath J
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1986; 18(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 3517355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmark data set for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity.
Hansen K; Mika S; Schroeter T; Sutter A; ter Laak A; Steger-Hartmann T; Heinrich N; Müller KR
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2077-81. PubMed ID: 19702240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel QSAR model of Salmonella mutagenicity and its application in the safety assessment of drug impurities.
Valencia A; Prous J; Mora O; Sadrieh N; Valerio LG
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 273(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 24090816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanistic QSAR of aromatic amines: new models for discriminating between homocyclic mutagens and nonmutagens, and validation of models for carcinogens.
Benigni R; Bossa C; Netzeva T; Rodomonte A; Tsakovska I
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2007 Dec; 48(9):754-71. PubMed ID: 18008355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of PAH mutagenicity in human cells by QSAR classification.
Papa E; Pilutti P; Gramatica P
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(1-2):115-27. PubMed ID: 18311639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of 11 in silico models for the prediction of small molecule mutagenicity: role of steric hindrance and electron-withdrawing groups.
Ford KA; Ryslik G; Chan BK; Lewin-Koh SC; Almeida D; Stokes M; Gomez SR
Toxicol Mech Methods; 2017 Jan; 27(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 27813437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
