BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27413204)

  • 1. Biosensor: an emerging safety tool for meat industry.
    Singh PK; Jairath G; Ahlawat SS; Pathera A; Singh P
    J Food Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 53(4):1759-65. PubMed ID: 27413204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contaminants of non-biological origin in foods from animals.
    McEwen SA; McNab WB
    Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):684-93. PubMed ID: 9501381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrospun nanofiber-based sensors for the detection of chemical and biological contaminants/hazards in the food industries.
    Akhavan-Mahdavi S; Mirbagheri MS; Assadpour E; Sani MA; Zhang F; Jafari SM
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2024 Mar; 325():103111. PubMed ID: 38367336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical biosensors for food quality and safety assurance-a review.
    Narsaiah K; Jha SN; Bhardwaj R; Sharma R; Kumar R
    J Food Sci Technol; 2012 Aug; 49(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 23904648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination Methods of the Risk Factors in Food Based on Nanozymes: A Review.
    Lang Y; Zhang B; Cai D; Tu W; Zhang J; Shentu X; Ye Z; Yu X
    Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36671904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biosensors for the analysis of microbiological and chemical contaminants in food.
    McGrath TF; Elliott CT; Fodey TL
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2012 Apr; 403(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 22278073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges to meat safety in the 21st century.
    Sofos JN
    Meat Sci; 2008 Jan; 78(1-2):3-13. PubMed ID: 22062090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. International red meat trade.
    Brester GW; Marsh JM; Plain RL
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2003 Jul; 19(2):493-518. PubMed ID: 12951744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Engineering nanomaterials-based biosensors for food safety detection.
    Lv M; Liu Y; Geng J; Kou X; Xin Z; Yang D
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2018 May; 106():122-128. PubMed ID: 29414078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Insight of Meat Industry in Pakistan with Special Reference to Halal Meat: A Comprehensive Review.
    Sohaib M; Jamil F
    Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour; 2017; 37(3):329-341. PubMed ID: 28747818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Paper-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Food Safety Analysis.
    Kuswandi B; Hidayat MA; Noviana E
    Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36551055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The organisation of the Department of Veterinary Services in Malaysia.
    Mohd Nor MN; Abu Mustapa AJ; Abu Hassan MA; Chang KW
    Rev Sci Tech; 2003 Aug; 22(2):485-97. PubMed ID: 15884584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semi-quantitative food safety risk profile of the Australian red meat industry.
    Hernandez-Jover M; Culley F; Heller J; Ward MP; Jenson I
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2021 Sep; 353():109294. PubMed ID: 34147838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry.
    Troy DJ; Kerry JP
    Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):214-26. PubMed ID: 20579814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overview of affinity biosensors in food analysis.
    Patel PD
    J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(3):805-18. PubMed ID: 16792079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Market analysis of biosensors for food safety.
    Alocilja EC; Radke SM
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2003 May; 18(5-6):841-6. PubMed ID: 12706600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A risk microbiological profile of the Australian red meat industry: risk ratings of hazard-product pairings.
    Sumner J; Ross T; Jenson I; Pointon A
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 105(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 16099063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumers' perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes as indicators of safety and quality of chicken meat: Actionable information for public health authorities and the chicken industry.
    Katiyo W; Coorey R; Buys EM; de Kock HL
    J Food Sci; 2020 Jun; 85(6):1845-1855. PubMed ID: 32469089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The anti-campylobacter activity of eugenol and its potential for poultry meat safety: A review.
    Gürbüz M; İrem Omurtag Korkmaz B
    Food Chem; 2022 Nov; 394():133519. PubMed ID: 35749879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foodborne agents associated with the consumption of aquaculture catfish.
    McCoy E; Morrison J; Cook V; Johnston J; Eblen D; Guo C
    J Food Prot; 2011 Mar; 74(3):500-16. PubMed ID: 21375890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.